JSA leads BC-wide campaign

Jeff Moss, executive director of the Jewish Seniors Alliance, speaks at the June 2 launch of the Health Care Needs Home Care campaign. (screenshot)

The Jewish Seniors Alliance of British Columbia is leading a broad coalition calling on the provincial government to eliminate fees for publicly funded home-support services, arguing that helping older adults remain safely at home would improve their quality of life while reducing pressure on hospitals and long-term-care facilities.

The Health Care Needs Home Care campaign was launched June 2 at the 411 Seniors Centre in Vancouver. Its partner organizations collectively represent or serve more than 400,000 seniors, caregivers and supporters across the province. The coalition is calling for access to home support to be determined by medical and practical need, rather than by a senior’s income or ability to pay.

Home-support workers assist people with daily activities such as bathing, dressing, preparing meals, taking medication and moving safely around their homes. Unlike many physician and hospital services, publicly delivered home support in British Columbia can require income-tested co-payments. The campaign argues that these charges place potentially essential care beyond the reach of many seniors. Its website says a senior earning $31,000 annually can be charged about $10,000 for one hour of home support a day over the year. Ontario and Alberta provide comparable publicly funded services without such fees. 

Jeff Moss, executive director of the Jewish Seniors Alliance, said the campaign is not seeking merely to reduce the co-payments. It wants them abolished.

The principle of universality is important, Moss said, because means-testing adds another layer of complexity to a system that can already be difficult to navigate, particularly for people experiencing cognitive changes, language barriers or other challenges.

“It’s the opposite of being a hospitable system,” he said. Under the proposed approach, once someone is assessed as requiring support, “we’ll get it for you.”

Questions inevitably arise about why affluent seniors should also receive publicly funded home support. Moss argued that seniors able and willing to buy customized private care would probably continue doing so. A universal public program, however, would avoid forcing vulnerable people to prove repeatedly that they are sufficiently poor or otherwise deserving of assistance.

The campaign’s broader argument is economic as well as humanitarian. When people cannot obtain affordable help at home, relatively manageable difficulties can escalate into emergencies. Seniors may end up in hospital after falls, medication problems, malnutrition or other preventable complications. Others may be moved into long-term care earlier than necessary because they lack sufficient support to remain at home.

The campaign estimates that an average 24-day hospital stay for a senior can cost about $24,000, compared with approximately $1,200 for 24 days of home support. It also says 61% of people entering long-term care received no home support during the preceding 90 days. 

Moss said governments cannot build long-term-care spaces quickly enough to meet the anticipated demand from an aging population. New facilities are expensive, require years of planning and construction, and often replace older beds rather than adding substantially to the total supply. In the Vancouver Coastal Health region, he said, projects completed or anticipated between 2009 and 2029 represent approximately 600 long-term-care beds, but only about 200 are net additions. A bed can cost more than $1 million to build, he added, while the provincial waiting list is already in the thousands and projected to grow substantially.

Providing more home support would not eliminate the need for residential care. It could, however, reserve those limited spaces for people whose medical and personal care needs genuinely cannot be met at home, said Moss.

The coalition involved in the campaign includes the Jewish Seniors Alliance, the Council of Senior Citizens’ Organizations of BC (COSCO), the Independent Long-Term Care Councils Association of BC, Family Caregivers of BC, the BC Health Coalition, the BC Care Providers Association, and Seniors First BC. 

Together, they represent a range of perspectives, including seniors themselves, unpaid family caregivers, long-term-care residents and families, care providers and advocates for the public health-care system. 

The campaign developed from advocacy work already underway at the JSA when Moss became executive director about two years ago. Its advocacy committee had identified home-support co-payments as a major barrier to aging in place and had begun meeting with public officials.

As the 2024 provincial election approached, the organization shifted from contacting individual MLAs to seeking commitments in party platforms. Moss said the proposal was included in the platforms of both BC United and the Conservative Party of BC.

After the election, advocates continued meeting with politicians, government representatives and seniors’ organizations. As more groups endorsed the objective, the effort grew into the present province-wide coalition.

Moss hopes the public campaign will generate at least 1,000 letters to MLAs and create sufficient pressure for meetings with the premier, health minister and finance minister during the coming fall legislative session.

The campaign website provides a form through which British Columbians can contact their MLAs. It is also collecting personal experiences from seniors and families who have experienced difficulty accessing home support because of the required fees. 

“Seniors are a big voting bloc,” Moss said. If the government does not move on the issue, he said, the coalition will continue approaching opposition parties to build support for a future policy change.

For Moss, JSA’s leadership in a campaign serving seniors of every background is significant in another respect. At a time when Jewish individuals and organizations have sometimes experienced exclusion from coalitions and public institutions, he views the campaign as an opportunity to demonstrate the Jewish community’s investment in the well-being of society as a whole.

The Jewish Seniors Alliance is rooted in Jewish tradition but provides programs and advocacy intended to benefit older adults throughout the province, regardless of identity. Moss said he deliberately connects the organization’s public work to Jewish values, whether he is addressing political caucuses, seniors’ organizations or community audiences.

“Too often,” he said, “people see our Jewish organizations as only focused on the Jewish community when, in reality, we all know that the Jewish community, as part of tikkun olam, [tries] to repair the world for all.” The home-care campaign, he said, is “a living testament to that.”

And its message is straightforward: home support should be considered part of health care, said Moss, not as an optional service available only to those who can afford it. 

Saving Israel’s environment

Israel’s Hula Valley is a major stopping place for migrating birds. (photo by D.J. Tiomkin)

Jay Shofet, the director of partnerships and development for the Society for the Protection of Nature in Israel (SPNI), presented an overview of the broad range of work his organization does in addressing environmental issues in the Holy Land during a Nov. 19 webinar hosted by the Jewish Community Centre of Victoria with the Canadian SPNI.

With 35,000 member households in Israel and thousands more around the world, SPNI is the largest Israeli group of its kind. It engages in environmental lobbying of the Knesset and hopes to foster a love of nature through its endeavours. SPNI has delivered environmental education in the Israeli school system and is known for promoting the country’s hiking trails.

Shofet began with the history of the environmental movement in Israel and the “traditional Jewish call for wise environmental stewardship of the land.” It was from this concept that SPNI was founded, in 1953, by a group of scientists, teachers and kibbutzniks who were trying to prevent the draining of swamps in the Hula Valley in northern Israel.

Among the highlights of SPNI’s history is an initiative it spearheaded in the 2000s: a cross-border and environmentally friendly cooperation with Jordan and Palestine to use barn owls rather than pesticides to reduce the rodent populations in agricultural lands.

Israel houses what the United Nations refers to as a “global biodiversity hotspot,” Shofet said. “It’s important to note that Israel is a land bridge between three continents and four climatic zones.”

The numbers of bird and animal species in Israel exceed that of the United Kingdom; the country is also home to a wide variety of flora. Species from Europe, North Africa and Asia commingle with those native to Israel and the eastern Mediterranean. And, each year, Israel is a major migration route for hundreds of millions of birds, including pelicans, which makes the country a destination for birders.

Elsewhere, SPNI has been active in stopping what it believes to be the wrong type of afforestation, the introduction of trees in areas to which they are not ideally suited and that infringe on the natural habitat, such as the batha, a unique Mediterranean scrubland, or what Shofet called “the Serengeti of Israel.”

SPNI is in charge of blazing and maintaining the Israel National Trail and other parts of the more than 10,000 kilometres of trail systems in the country. “It’s a rite of passage for young Israelis to hike the Trail,” Shofet said about the INT.

Recently, the organization has focused on maintaining what Shofet described as a “sustainability mindset.”

“Renewable energy, moving away from fossil fuels, is what the environmental movement is about today,” he said. “Climate change is the organizing principle of the movement…. Our bottom line is to find nature-based solutions to mitigate climate change.”

At the top of current environmental issues for Israel is land-use planning, said Shofet. One of the densest populations of the OECD countries, Israel confronts obstacles in the use of its land. In 2015, SPNI lobbied to stop a group of business and political powerhouses, including former United States vice-president Dick Cheney and media tycoon Rupert Murdoch, from fracking in the centre of Israel.

Shofet emphasized that densely packed, sustainable cities like Tel Aviv are at the heart of protecting Israel’s biodiversity. “This is the only way to keep the open spaces open and to keep nature well-protected,” he said.

“Not all of Israel has to look like Tel Aviv, but Israel does have to build its cities in a smarter way and avoid suburban sprawl,” he told the audience. “Suburban sprawl is killing our open spaces and making life less interesting for people. Cities can be the solution to the environment. If the world had the global footprint of New York City, there would be no global warming.”

A niche for SPNI is urban nature. Such spaces are needed in green cities, said Shofet. To demonstrate this, he showed slides of the Jerusalem Bird Observatory near the Knesset, a place where schoolchildren and tourists alike visit and learn about ornithology up close, and Gazelle Valley Park, also in Jerusalem, Israel’s first urban nature reserve.

The final part of Shofet’s talk touched on the work SPNI is doing during the pandemic to try and ban Israel’s currently legal hunting season. As a start, SPNI has succeeded in getting the Ministry of Environmental Protection to call the laughing dove and the quail endangered species.

SPNI is also rehabilitating the nation’s rivers, trying to protect the diverse number of species and habitats found in its sea, promoting the use of solar energy, working to ensure that Israel has clean and accessible beaches, and encouraging the planting of trees in a way that is mindful of the country’s ecosystem.

Shofet’s concluding remarks offered a hopeful note to the current global environmental situation and Israel’s role in it, pointing out that the entrepreneurial spirit of the start-up nation is well-suited to tackling the challenges of adapting to the green economy.

For more information, visit natureisrael.org.

Sam Margolis has written for the Globe and Mail, the National Post, UPI and MSNBC.