Skip to content
  • Home
  • Subscribe / donate
  • Events calendar
  • News
    • Local
    • National
    • Israel
    • World
    • עניין בחדשות
      A roundup of news in Canada and further afield, in Hebrew.
  • Opinion
    • From the JI
    • Op-Ed
  • Arts & Culture
    • Performing Arts
    • Music
    • Books
    • Visual Arts
    • TV & Film
  • Life
    • Celebrating the Holidays
    • Travel
    • The Daily Snooze
      Cartoons by Jacob Samuel
    • Mystery Photo
      Help the JI and JMABC fill in the gaps in our archives.
  • Community Links
    • Organizations, Etc.
    • Other News Sources & Blogs
    • Business Directory
  • FAQ
  • JI Chai Celebration
  • JI@88! video

Recent Posts

  • עשרים ואחת שנים להגעתי לונקובר
  • Eby touts government record
  • Keep lighting candles
  • Facing a complex situation
  • Unique interview show a hit
  • See Annie at Gateway
  • Explorations of light
  • Help with the legal aspects
  • Stories create impact
  • Different faiths gather
  • Advocating for girls’ rights
  • An oral song tradition
  • Genealogy tools and tips
  • Jew-hatred is centuries old
  • Aiding medical research
  • Connecting Jews to Judaism
  • Beacon of light in heart of city
  • Drag & Dreidel: A Queer Jewish Hanukkah Celebration
  • An emotional reunion
  • Post-tumble, lights still shine
  • Visit to cradle of Ashkenaz
  • Unique, memorable travels
  • Family memoir a work of art
  • A little holiday romance
  • The Maccabees, old and new
  • My Hanukkah miracle
  • After the rededication … a Hanukkah cartoon
  • Improving the holiday table
  • Vive la différence!
  • Fresh, healthy comfort foods
  • From the archives … Hanukkah
  • תגובתי לכתבה על ישראלים שרצו להגר לקנדה ולא קיבלו אותם עם שטיח אדום
  • Lessons in Mamdani’s win
  • West Van Story at the York
  • Words hold much power
  • Plenty of hopefulness

Archives

Follow @JewishIndie
image - The CJN - Visit Us Banner - 300x600 - 101625

Edmonton’s Anne Frank statue

Edmonton’s Anne Frank statue

Officials in Edmonton unveil the first sculpture of Anne Frank in Canada. (photo by John Stobbe/Dutch Canadian Centre)

On Aug. 8, 2021, officials in Edmonton unveiled the first sculpture of Anne Frank anywhere in Canada. The world’s newest memorial to her – a life-sized bronze sculpture gifted by the Dutch Canadian Club, based in Alberta – now sits in a park in Edmonton. It is a replica of one that stands in Utrecht, Netherlands.

The unveiling marks the 75th anniversary of the liberation of Holland in the Second World War, and gives thanks to the Canadian soldiers who freed their country from Nazi Germany in 1945. But there’s a second meaning behind the timing – and it’s a strange coincidence. On this August weekend, 77 years ago, Nazis raided the secret annex in Amsterdam, where Frank and her family had been hiding for nearly two years, and arrested them. A few days later, they were sent to the Westerbork transit camp and, later, they would be shipped to Auschwitz.

On the Aug. 9 CJN Daily Podcast (ellinbessner.com/the-cjn-daily-podcast), readers can hear from the people who pushed for the statue and raised $75,000 to create and erect it, as well as from Gillian Horwitz, who runs Holocaust programming for the Jewish Federation of Edmonton, and Steve Shafir, the federation’s president, who were at the unveiling ceremony in person.

– For more Jewish national news, visit thecjn.ca

 

Format ImagePosted on August 20, 2021August 20, 2021Author Ellin Bessner THE CJNCategories NationalTags Anne Frank, Edmonton, Holocaust, memorial, podcasts
הקוביד מראה את ההבדלים בין קנדה לדרום אמריקה

הקוביד מראה את ההבדלים בין קנדה לדרום אמריקה

(photo from essenceofemail.com)

בחודשים האחרונים בזמן שמגפת הקורונה ממשיכה לטלטל את חיינו התכתבתי מספר פעמים עם מכר שגר בדרום אמריקה. הוא בחר לגור באחד מהאזורים הבעייתיים בעולם, והקוביד מראה בברור מה ההבדל ביננו החיים בקנדה המסודרת, לבינם החיים בג’ונגל אין סופי של בעיות. שלא נדע.

אומר לי המכר הדרום אמריקני: “כאשר אתה רואה כיצד בני העשרים משתוללים כאן בדרום אמריקה כאילו אכול ושתוה אז מה נגיד על כך?”

בנושא החיסונים הראה לי מכרי שדעתו שונה מדעתי והוא שאב מידע ממש לא נכון. אצלנו כאן במערב החיסונים הם הפתרון הקבוע, הברור ובעצם היחידי להילחם במגפה. ואלו אצלו הכול הפוך משום מה. “החיסון של פייזר נניח עובד לטווח הקצר. בעולם המערבי אפשר להיות יותר אופטימי, אבל הייתי מציג אופטימיות זהירה. כל פעם מתגלות מוטציות חדשות שהמומחים בעיני עצמם טוענים שלא בטוח שהחיסון מכסה אותם. אני לא מתנגד לחיסונים אך הם הרע במיעוטו. סיפרתי לך שכמה ממקורביי סבלו מתופעות לוואי חמורות אחרי שקיבלו את החיסון. אני אוהב להקשיב למגוון דעות. זה לא אומר שאני מתנגד. החיסונים אינם נותנים מענה של מאה אחוז לקוביד והתאמתם טובה לרוב האוכלוסייה, אך לא לכולה”.

אכן יש לחיסונים תופעות לוואי אמרתי לו אך הן בטלות בשישים לעומת היתרונות הגדולים בהגנה שהם מייצרים. אך הוא בשלו חי בעולם לא מציאותי.

ההחמרה כיום במגפת הקוביד נובעת מסיבה אחת עיקרית: רבים בעולם כולל בארה”ב, קנדה וישראל – עדיין לא חוסנו. זה שורש הבעיה ועלינו מוטל להסביר לכל מתנגדי החיסונים עד כמה חשוב שגם הם יחוסנו, עבורם ועבור כולנו. לצערי המכר מדרום אמריקה חושב אחרת לגמרי: “אני עצמי נמנע מכל תעמולה בעד או נגד של החיסונים וברור שאין כיום פתרון טוב יותר לעתיד העולם. אני לא מיסיונר של חיסונים אך גם לא נוהג כמו המטורפים שטוענים שאין בכלל קוביד”.

זה נכון שתחילה עת שפורסם המידע הראשונה על הטכנולוגיה החדישה, בהן משתמשות יצרניות החיסונים חברת ביונטק הגרמנית שמשתפת פעולה עם חברת פייזר האמריקנית וחברת מודרנה האמריקנית, היה חשש שיש סכנה בדבר. אך לאחר שבוצעו הניסויים התברר שין מקום לחשש. החיסונים החדישים עובדים ואינם מסכנים את בריאותנו, למעט תופעות לוואי אצל מעטים. האיש מדרום אמריקה לא מעודכן ומסביר לי דברים שכבר שכחנו: “השפעת החיסונים תיקבע לא רק בטווח הקצר אלא בטווח הארוך. חברות התרופות משתמשות בשיטות חדישות שיוצרות מצב שיכול לגרום לשינוי בדי. אן. איי. את זה אומרים מומחים גדולים ממני וממך. צריך להקשיב לטעמי גם לטענות הללו של המומחים. אני עצמי לא עסוק בנושא יומם ולילה. אני עסוק בדברים שמעסיקים אותי וגורמים לי להנאה גדולה יותר”.

אנו במערב יודעים שהחיסונים עובדים ויתכן ונזקק לחיסון שלישי לקראת סוף השנה. אולי נקבל חיסון נגד הקוביד מדי שנה כך שהדבר יהפוך לנורמה, כמו החיסונים לשפעת. אצל המכר מדרום אמריקה הכול זמני ממש כמו כל החיים ביבשת הזו: “אין בכלל ויכוח שהחיסונים ללא יוצא מן הכלל הם לא לכל החיים. לכך אני מתכוון שאני כותב שהם זמניים. זה ברור כשמש. ברור כבר אחרי שנה יצטרכו לתת חיסון שלישי. מה יהיה אחרי החיסון השלישי זו שאלה שאין תשובה עליה כרגע. ברור לגמרי שהמדענים ידאגו שהחיסונים האלה ילכו וישתפרו עם הזמן בתקווה שיהפכו לחיסון אחד ויחיד ולכל החיים”.

הדרום אמריקני מסביר לי על הבעיות ביבשת שלו. כבר אמרתי לו בעבר שעליו לצאת משם אך הוא מסרב מסיבותיו שלו. יכולתי בעבר אולי לעזור לו להגר לוונקובר אך הוא לא מעוניין. לכן לא מפתיע מה שהוא אומר על האזור בו הוא חי: “המרחק בין קנדה לדרום אמריקה הוא כמו המרחק בינה לבין גלקסיה אחרת. אתה כותב מוונקובר, שם הכול נראה סביר יותר. תראה קצת חדשות מארצות דרום אמריקה ותבין כמה חמורה המגפה כאן. המנהיגים בדרום אמריקה בוחרים בחיסון הסיני כי זה הפתרון הכי קל ואת דעתי עליהם אתה יודע. זה גם הכי זול והם מקבלים גם חלק בחינם. החברות המערביות כמו פייזר שולחות כמויות סמליות והם לא רוצים או יכולים לחכות. המנהיגים כאן מנסים להציג לעמים שלהם מצג שווא כאילו הם נאבקים בהצלחה במגפה. הנה, השגנו חיסונים. אבל תראה מה קורה בצ’ילה. זה לא יאומן. זה אומר הכול, אבל איפה הפרשנים? צ’ילה שהיא המדינה שהתחסנה בהיקף הכי גדול בדרום אמריקה והכי מהר, אלא מה. חיסונים סיניים. ומה לדעתך קורה שם? גל מגפה גדול שוטף שוב את המדינה. נדמה לי שצריך לעשות אחד ועוד אחד, אבל אני לא שומע את הפרשנים משמיעים את הפרשנות הנכונה ומתריעים. סין  מוכרת חיסונים סוג ז’, ככה שמי מהמעצמות שיתרום או ימכור הראשון הוא שישיג את ההשפעה שהוא מחפש. הצרה היא שהסינים מספקים הכי מהר את הסחורה וההמונים ישלמו את המחיר כמו בצ’ילה. כנראה שהרשויות כאן פוחדות מסין ולא רוצות לצאת נגדה. הציבור מטומטם והציבור ישלם. אבל גם המנהיגים. זה עניין פוליטי מורכב. נשיא ארה”ב ג’ו ביידן, כדאי שיחלק 500 מיליון חיסונים בין מאה ארצות בצורה שווה. זה הדבר הנכון לעשות. בדרום אמריקה המגפה משתוללת הרבה יותר מאשר באפריקה”.

כדי לנחם את המכר מדרום אמריקה המסביר כל הזמן כמה המצב קשה באזורו, שלחתי לו ידיעה אינפורמטיבית מרויטרס על חיסונים שנרכשו עבור מדינתו. משום מה הוא התבלבל (כנראה בהשפעת הסגר הקשה ועוד צרות של קוביד) וטען ששלחתי לו פיק ניוז, על כך שכביכול מדינתו תקבל מיליוני מנות של פייזר. זה פשוט לא נכון כי רויטרס דיברו על מספר כולל של חיסונים שיגיע למדינתו, כולל הרוסיים ופייזר. אז מה הוא אומר לי: “אני סבור שלא צריך לעסוק יותר מדי בדיון על החיסונים, כי המציאות כאן שונה וכדי להבין אותה צריך ללמוד את הנושא. שלחת לי מאמר באנגלית. האם אתה מאמין שאכן מנהיגים לטינים יעמדו במילתם? מתי בדיוק זה קרה?  אם טראמפ היה פיק ניוז, אז מה נגיד על דרום אמריקה? המצב כאן בעייתי ואף חמור. נתנו לקשישים בני שמונים ותשעים להמתין תחת השמש או הגשם שעות רבות, כדי לקבל חיסונים. ומי אתה חושב היא המדינה הראשונה ששולחת חיסונים? יפה, ניחשת. סין. היא שלחה מיליוני חיסונים לעומת כמאה אלף של פייזר. מן הנתונים האלה אתה יכול להבין את התמונה המדויקת. יגיעו גם חיסוני ספוטניק. כדי לקבל פייזר צריך ממש פרוטקציה. אז אל תכתוב לי בבקשה יותר שאני מתנגד לפייזר בגלל שיש זריקה שלישית או כל סיבה אחרת. אני מתנגד לחיסון סיני”. המכר שוב התבלבל כי מעולם לא כתבתי שהוא מתנגד לחיסון שלישי ולא הזכרתי במילה את החיסונים הסיניים שאינני מחשיבם בכלל. המגפה בלבלה אותו עוד יותר.

לשמחתנו כאן בקנדה המצב הרבה יותר טוב מדרום אמריקה. תמיד טענתי שבעת משברים רואים את ההבדלים הגדולים בין צפון אמריקה לדרומה. אך מי שבחר מרצון לחיות ביבשת הדרומית צריך להבין שהוא לקח על עצמו סכנות אין ספור. המכר הדרומי מתעצבן על הדיון במגפה וכותב לי בקצור רוח: “כשכתבתי לך שלא מעניין אותי לעסוק בחיסונים זה מן הטעם הפשוט: המצב כאן ברור עבורי, ואין סיבה לדוש בזה יותר מאשר בשיחה קצרה ותמציתית ואין צורך בהתכתבות ארוכה שמייצרת אי הבנות. כשאתה כותב לי על המצב בישראל או אצלך, אני שמח לשמוע, אבל לצערנו זה לא המצב בדרום אמריקה. די נמאס לי לעסוק בזה. אני קורא מהר ומבין מהר. לא מעוניין לעסוק בנושא החיסונים כל הזמן. אלה הן אנרגיות שליליות שגוזלות לא רק זמן רב אלא גם אנרגיות חיוביות שעוזרות לי להיות פרודוקטיבי בענייני. זו הגישה שלי כרגע והיא הנכונה למצב. היא מביאה לתוצאות”.

אנו בקנדה ובמערב בכלל מאמינים בחיסונים והם נותנים את המענה הנכון, למגפה שפקדה אותנו מזה כשנה וחצי. אך האיש מהדרום ספקן ביותר: “ברור שדעתי על החיסונים חיובית אבל אני אדם ספקן, תמיד הייתי ותמיד אישאר לשמחתי. במצב הנוכחי של העולם, החיסונים הם הפתרון הכי טוב לסיטואציה. אבל כשאני מדבר על הרע במיעוטו אני מתכוון למשהו אחר. כשאני מדבר על חיסון זמני אני מתכוון לחיסון לשנה. זה מה שאומרים המומחים ומנהלי חברות המייצרות את החיסונים. הפעם כנראה שזה לא פיק ניוז. אני רק מצטט אותם”.

המכר מדרום אמריקה מנסה להסביר לי עתה את מה שקורה בישראל. כאילו לא ידעתי. הוא אומר: “לגבי נתוני פייזר ובכן ישראל אכן הייתה מעבדה ניסיונית שלהם. הם אמרו בהתחלה שההגנה היא של תשעים וחמישה אחוז. אבל אחרי הניסוי בישראל הם אמרו שההגנה היא רק של תעשים ואחד אחוזי הצלחה למניעת המחלה בכלל ותשעים וחמישה אחוז של מניעת מחלה קשה. כשכתבתי לך על הנתון הזה ברור שלא מובן מזה שאני מצפה להגנה של מאה אחוז. מה פתאום? אין מאה אחוז ושלמות בשום דבר. הם הגיעו לאחוז הזה בתוך תקופה כה קצרה זה בהחלט עבודה חשובה של המדענים. אם אתה שואל אותי גם חיסון של שמונים או שמונים וחמישה אחוז הוא ראוי. אני מזכיר לך שאני אדם שיודע לתחקר ואם אני כותב לך מידע, זה מבוסס. בזמן האחרון אני קורא פחות כי זה די משעמם”.

שוב הוא נזכר להסביר לי בפעם המאה עד כמה המצב קשה בדרום אמריקה. אגב אם אני אזכיר לו את הבעיות הקשות ביבשת שלו שעולות ממה שהוא אומר לי מזה חודשים ארוכים, יטען האיש כי אני “מעצים” את הדברים, בזמן שבעצם הוא מדחיק אותם. “אני חי במציאות אחרת ממך ובמציאות שלי יש מגפה, יש סיכונים גדולים, מכפי שאתה מכיר, ואין חיסונים לפי שעה שנותנים מענה אמיתי למגפה. חיסון סיני להערכתי לא נותן מענה מספיק. כמות הנדבקים כאן ממשיכה להיות גדולה כמו בכל רחבי דרום אמריקה. שים לב, אין כאן תרופות שנותנות מענה אמיתי לקוביד. בתי החולים מפוצצים, בימים האחרונים רופאים מפגינים נגד האנומליה שאין תרופות. בעבר המצב כאן היה חמור אף יותר. חוקי המשחק כאן שונים לגמרי מכפי שאתה מכיר. כמות הנדבקים גדולה עשרות מונים יותר ממה שמדווחים, כמות המתים גדולה כאן בהרבה ממה שמדווחים, ואף אחד כאן לא אומר את האמת”.

כמה טוב לי שאני חי בוונקובר ובמערב ורחוק עד כמה שאפשר מהדרום הבעייתי.

Format ImagePosted on August 12, 2021August 12, 2021Author Roni RachmaniCategories עניין בחדשותTags Canada, COVID, health, pandemic, South America, vaccine, בריאות, דרום אמריקה, חיסון, מגפה, קוביד, קנדה
Hate not acceptable at SFU

Hate not acceptable at SFU

“Antisemitism is hate, and it is not acceptable at SFU,” said Simon Fraser University president and vice-chancellor Joy Johnson. (photo by Jeff Hitchcock / flickr)

The president of Simon Fraser University met with Jewish students recently and issued a statement condemning antisemitism on campus and directing those who experience anti-Jewish racism to appropriate resources.

After meeting with Jewish students, Joy Johnson, Simon Fraser’s president and vice-chancellor, tweeted on July 12: “Their experiences were deeply upsetting.”

“Antisemitism is hate, and it is not acceptable at SFU,” she added. “If you are experiencing discrimination or hate, help is available. Please reach out.”

The university, in consultation with the SFU Multifaith Centre and Hillel BC, created a resource for those who have experienced antisemitism. This includes links to campus chaplains, confidential counseling and critical incident support for significant events.

Like many university campuses, SFU has a history of anti-Israel activism that can often veer into antisemitic imagery and tropes. The latest eruption occurred at the first council meeting of a newly elected Simon Fraser Students Society. Occurring around the time of the most recent conflict between Hamas and Israel, the council meeting passed a resolution endorsing the boycott, divestment and sanction movement against Israel (BDS) in what Jewish students view as a biased and unfair meeting.

The student society’s resolution – titled “SFSS Response to the Israeli Colonization of Palestine” – accused Israel of “disproportionate violence,” claiming “worshippers at the Al-Aqsa Mosque were indiscriminately targeted by Israeli police forces” and condemning “the ongoing persecution of the Palestinian people by the government of Israel.” The resolution endorsed the BDS movement and expressed no parallel concerns about Palestinian terrorism, violence, incitement or human rights abuses. It also accused the United States and Canada of complicity in perceived Israeli misdeeds. The resolution passed unanimously.

The student society brought in Dalya Masri, a Palestinian activist, to provide “expert” testimony before the vote, said Katia Fermon, outreach coordinator for Hillel BC, the Jewish student organization.

“She gave a presentation, which was beyond hurtful for Jewish students,” said Fermon. Masri, she said, compared the First Intifada to the sort of peaceful rallies that happen on the streets of Vancouver.

“My students have family that died in the First and the Second Intifada,” Fermon said. “This is not a strange thing for us, and she just mentioned it like it was a rally.”

The presenter accused Israel of taking over territory in 1967, while eliding the larger facts around the Six Day War and other realities, she said.

Fermon said that, in preparation for the vote, the SFSS consulted with Independent Jewish Voices, but did not consult with Hillel.

“That fact is very hurtful,” she said. “Independent Jewish Voices is not a club on campus, however Hillel Jewish Students Association is. They pay their dues.… We are a part of that union. Those voices were not asked for or heard.”

Hillel BC issued a statement condemning the student society’s approach.

“Instead of supporting an open and extensive dialogue amongst students, the SFSS has chosen to perpetuate the agenda of a movement whose use of harmful terminology fails to address the root causes of the conflict, ignoring centuries of complex history in which power dynamics constantly shifted,” it reads. “This rhetoric further sows hate and division instead of helping work towards a peaceful two-state solution. The SFSS has decided to single out the state of Israel instead of opening a space for adequate dialogue between Jewish, Israeli and Palestinian students on campus wherein we may critique the policies of the state while being mindful of the hate that may result in endorsing certain statements, activists or movements.”

It added that BDS “openly traffics in antisemitic conspiracies and dog whistles” and noted that nearly two decades of BDS activism has not “freed Palestine from violence or oppression. Instead, it has been to stoke aggression and polarization online, in the streets and on campuses.”

In a statement to the Independent, Nico Slobinsky, director of the Centre for Israel and Jewish Affairs, Pacific region, said: “The statement by SFU’s president is an important step in denouncing the rising tide of anti-Jewish hate on campus. CIJA thanks president Dr. Joy Johnson for recognizing that SFU is not immune from antisemitism. Combating anti-Jewish hatred is not only about protecting Jews but also about protecting the very fabric of our society, on and off campus.

“CIJA appreciates the strong friendship and commitment shown by Dr. Johnson to creating a campus that is inclusive, diverse, safe and open to all students,” Slobinsky added. “CIJA looks forward to working with SFU alongside our campus partner, Hillel BC, towards ensuring a healthy campus environment.”

Students have been studying remotely for more than a year and so most of the discussion, which has included a litany of offensive comments, has taken place on official and unofficial online platforms, including the primary undergraduate forum.

One Israeli student, who asked to remain anonymous, said she was one of a few who spoke up in opposition to the prevailing bias in the dialogue.

“I didn’t expect it to go smoothly,” she said. “There was a lot of backlash in the moment and it is still going on.… A lot of comments are being deleted and monitored but there are a lot of hateful comments.”

The statements frequently included slogans such as “From the river to the sea, Palestine will be free” and other comments promising the annihilation of Israel. Israel was compared with Nazi Germany, Rhodesia, apartheid-era South Africa and plantation-owning slaveholders. Concerns about the safety of Jewish people were dismissed as efforts to “stifle” legitimate criticism of Israel.

“As an Israeli, I don’t want to believe they said them personally to me,” the student said. “I try my best not to take all those comments personally, but sometimes it gets there.”

As she and other students prepare to return to campus this fall for the first time in more than a year, she said she is not concerned for her personal safety, but she is worried about some of her friends.

“I was born in Israel and I have a little bit of Israeli inside of me so, for myself, I’m not that worried,” she said. “Obviously, it’s not a nice experience.” Whether the online threats and vitriol turn into real-time incidents remains to be seen, she said, but some of her Jewish friends are already taking cover.

“They are not wearing their Star of David,” she said. “They never say out publicly that they are Jewish: to not get into a conflict, to avoid any debate on the matter, they just decided not to. I think it’s a shame…. It is a shame that we live in Canada in the 21st century and people are choosing to hide part of their identity. For myself, it’s a big chunk of my identity, so I’m not going to hide it, but I can’t blame people who choose to. I empathize with them.”

Format ImagePosted on July 23, 2021July 21, 2021Author Pat JohnsonCategories LocalTags antisemitism, BDS, CIJA, hate, Hillel BC, identity, Israel, Israeli-Palestinian conflict, Joy Johnson, Katia Fermon, Nico Slobinsky, Palestine, SFU, Simon Fraser University, students
Listening and learning

Listening and learning

Juneteenth webinar panelists (clockwise from top left) Heather Miller, Dr. Tameika Minor, Rafi Forbush and Kendell Pinkney. (photos from internet)

The United Synagogues of Conservative Judaism (USCJ) held a webinar entitled Juneteenth Through the Eyes of Jews of Colour: Sharing Stories and Perspectives on June 17, the same day the United States declared Juneteenth (June 19) a federal holiday. Slaves were freed from Texas, the last Confederate state with institutionalized slavery, on June 19, 1865.

The objectives of the evening were to establish better dialogue, to create a space to honour the Jewish and Black communities, to learn about the challenges people of colour have in the Jewish community, and to find the means by which people of colour can feel welcome in the Jewish community. Marques Hollie, a theatre artist, storyteller and musician, led the evening with a rendition of the post-Civil War song “Oh Freedom.”

“Our people crossed the Red Sea. People of colour are still in Egypt. For Black people, freedom has not come fast enough and not in a straight line,” said Ruth Messinger, a former politician and head of the American Jewish World Service, in opening remarks that preceded the introduction of the panel discussion.

The four panelists were Heather Miller, Dr. Tameika Minor, Kendell Pinkney and Rafi Forbush. Rabbi Ari Lucas of Congregation Agudath Israel in Caldwell, N.J., moderated the event. Lucas encouraged the audience to listen before asking questions.

“In a lot of ways, I feel like I came out as a Black person last year,” said Miller, president of the Jewish Centre in Brooklyn and a future rabbi. “In the Jewish spaces I have been in, people have tried not to see my colour. The stakes are different for us than the majority of people in this Zoom room. I was afraid this would just be a moment for everyone else and that the world would go back to not seeing this stuff again after the pandemic. I was afraid of being left exposed without a community.”

Minor, a professor in clinical mental health counseling and rehabilitation counseling at Rutgers University, said she would like to see Juneteenth become a day of reflection and not just celebration. “Reflection of where we have come from and how far we have to go,” she said. “It’s not a day we should sit back and not look at the wealth gap, mass incarceration and police brutality. Now it is a federal holiday, and yet so many states are banning critical race theory in schools.”

“For me, the question isn’t what does Juneteenth mean to me now but what might it mean to us moving forward,” said Pinkney, a Brooklyn-based theatre writer, Jewish-life consultant and rabbinical student at the Jewish Theological Seminary. “The Jewish people are so, so good at crafting stories, creating rituals. What rituals might be created 20 years from now around Juneteenth? Which stories and voices will we finally open our ears to?”

He added, “I like to think of it more as a promise of what might be and what we might become as a Jewish community.”

Rounding out the panel was Forbush, youth director at Beth Jacob Congregation in Mendota Heights (St. Paul) and founder of the Multiracial Jewish Association of Minnesota, which focuses on creating space for Jews of colour to connect to one another, through the community, education and advocacy.

“If you had told me that our community would be having this conversation at the beginning of the pandemic, I would have laughed at you,” said Forbush. “There is a bright light in our community starting to see outside of ourselves. If we are a people and not a race, then we owe it to each other to get to know who we are. The idea here is, extend the tent and not move it to exclude somebody else.”

Like Pinkney, Forbush spoke of the potential the holiday holds for the future and the sense of inclusion it can bring to the entire community. He pointed out that young Jews of colour often feel excluded.

Throughout the webinar, the panelists touched on various points of exclusion they feel as part of a community – of not believing they are entirely heard and of the microaggressions that occur in Jewish spaces, such as being quizzed on aspects of Jewish life or being viewed as staff and not a member of the community. Understandably, these are the sorts of issues that drive Jews of colour away from synagogues and other Jewish institutions.

The hope was expressed that Jews of colour could achieve more positions of leadership within Jewish organizations. There was also a sense that the community as a whole is not achieving its full potential without engaging more actively and openly with Jews of colour.

“This year, as we expand upon the understandings of diversity and inclusion, we have, despite COVID, actively widened the doors to our tent so to speak,” said Rabbi Susan Tendler of Richmond’s Congregation Beth Tikvah, which has been promoting the recent USCJ webinars on reaching out to interracial families and building a larger sense of inclusion for all Jews.

“We have actively listened and considered with compassion the feelings of people who may want to enter and yet find barriers to feeling authentically accepted within the larger Jewish community,” she told theIndependent. “United Synagogue’s program on Juneteenth is one example of many in which we have taken the opportunity to listen and learn.”

Sam Margolis has written for the Globe and Mail, the National Post, UPI and MSNBC.

Format ImagePosted on July 23, 2021July 21, 2021Author Sam MargolisCategories WorldTags Beth Tikvah, Heather Miller, identity, identity issues, inclusion, Jews of colour, Juneteenth, Kendell Pinkney, Rafi Forbush, Susan Tendler, synagogues, Tameika Minor, United Synagogues of Conservative Judaism, USCJ

Lessons of Greens’ row

The ongoing squabbles in the Green Party of Canada stopped short of a bloodbath Monday, after opponents of leader Annamie Paul abruptly holstered their figurative weapons.

A litany of threats against the leader was dropped that day. These included a non-confidence vote by the party’s national governing body, which was to take place Tuesday. But the vendetta against Paul went further, with one faction on the national board taking steps to strip Paul of her membership in the party. Also, a $250,000 fund that had been allocated for Paul’s campaign in the Toronto Centre riding, where she hopes to gain a seat in the House of Commons, was apparently withheld.

Ostensibly, the turmoil was a result of Paul’s reaction to the conflict between Israel and Hamas last spring. At the time, the leader posted an innocuous message on Twitter calling for de-escalation and a return to dialogue. This was met with an outraged retort from Jenica Atwin who was, at the time, one of the Green party’s three MPs. Apparently not a big fan of de-escalation and dialogue, Atwin called Paul’s statement “totally inadequate.”

Matters escalated after Paul’s senior advisor responded with an impolitic rant of his own, accusing MPs of antisemitism and threatening to eject sitting Green MPs and replace them with Zionists.

At this, Atwin crossed the floor, joining the Liberal party. Within days, her new political masters had apparently read her the riot act and she recanted her words. The principles that led her to cross the floor could not, evidently, withstand the pressure from the prime minister’s office.

There is a great deal that this quick synopsis overlooks. Paul has been accused of being uncommunicative with Green MPs and other officials. In response, she has said that she is a victim of racism and sexism.

None of this should be a surprise, perhaps. Paul was always going to have an uphill battle. During the leadership contest when she was elected, less than a year ago, Paul was the subject of horrific racist online attacks based on her identity as a Jewish Black woman. During that campaign and since, she has walked a moderate line on foreign policy and her statement during the Gaza conflict was in keeping with a reasonable, balanced approach to the issue.

But there are people in the Green party for whom reason and balance on this issue are unwelcome. The candidate who Paul defeated narrowly on the final ballot is one of Canada’s most vocal anti-Israel campaigners. One almost suspects some members were merely waiting for an opportunity to pounce.

While the members of the party’s national council did not explain their actions in apparently backing down from the fight, it is likely that at least a modicum of common sense prevailed, with activists realizing that they were preparing to defenestrate their leader weeks, or even days, before a possible federal election call.

The whole fiasco has been disturbing. A leader with superb credentials in international affairs is thrown into turmoil because she refused to take a one-sided approach to a significant issue. To suggest Paul has been anything like a Zionist firebrand is nonsense. Her “crime” was not jumping on a bandwagon on to which too many of her grassroots members (and perhaps a couple of her MPs) have jumped.

She got a reprieve this week. Depending on how she does in the expected federal election, she may face the same opponents again afterward. On the other hand, could this represent a turning point?

Whatever your politics, Paul is an impressive individual. Her voice – especially on the never-more-relevant issues of environment and climate change – is needed in our politics. Whatever her gut views about Israel and Palestine, Paul is smart enough to know that a party that subscribes to an anti-Israel line is going nowhere fast.

Arguably the most successful Green party in the world is that in Germany. Annalena Baerbock, its candidate for chancellor in September’s election, is aiming to replace Angela Merkel and some opinion polls say she will win. Put mildly, Germany and its politicians have a unique appreciation of issues involving Jews and the Jewish state. But it is likely significant that, of all the world’s Green parties, Germany’s is perhaps the most open to Israel, in all its complexities. Thoughtful voters recognize that a reasoned approach to the Israel-Palestine issue is a sign of a party that is ready for prime time.

Advocating for Palestinian human rights is important and admirable – assuming it is genuine and not merely an excuse to excoriate Israel with no constructive impact on actual Palestinians. But spouting hateful slogans and libels about Israel does not instil confidence in ordinary voters. Annamie Paul knows this. It could save her party – if they let her.

Posted on July 23, 2021July 21, 2021Author The Editorial BoardCategories UncategorizedTags Annamie Paul, Green party, Israeli-Palestinian conflict, politics

Recalibrating our life route

In the summer, we read through Torah portions that sound like very weird vacation routes. As a Shabbat regular joked during our livestreamed service, it sounded like the old-fashioned CAA TripTiks.

In the days before GPS or MapQuest, you went to your local automobile association’s shop. A travel agent would hand you tour books for wherever you were traveling and create a personal set of maps, with highlighted routes, for your journey. With lots of tips for where to stop, eat and how to use your sightseeing time along the way, it was pretty useful. I used those tour books in years past, but my family eschewed the TripTiks; my parents insisted we could read maps on our own.

Considering the long list of places that the Israelites went during their 40 years in the wilderness, it could be compared to a family summer vacation gone wrong. Rather than the fastest, most direct route between two points, the Israelites wandered. In fact, it was their behaviour and relationship with G-d that had gone wrong. This exile and wandering was very much about the journey. In Numbers 32:13, it says: “The Lord was incensed at Israel and for 40 years He made them wander in the wilderness, until the whole generation that had provoked the Lord’s displeasure was gone.”

We often talk in platitudes, like “life’s a journey, not a destination,” but let’s be honest. Most of us want to get places in life – accomplish things and do things properly. We might enjoy hiking or meandering down country roads, but most of us don’t want to see our whole lives as a lot of meaningless wandering.

This issue hit home for me in my recent studying of Tractate Yoma, which is all about how Yom Kippur works. Towards the end of the tractate, on page 86A, the rabbis discuss repentance and the notion of “hillul Hashem” or “desecrating the name of G-d.” Their explanations don’t seem direct at first. Rav suggests it’s like when a public figure, such as him, goes to the butcher, takes meat and doesn’t pay immediately, thus setting a bad example. Rav Yohanan suggests that, if one walks a distance without Torah or tefillin, it indicates a lack of appropriate respect for the Divine.

The tractate continues with when someone’s friends are embarrassed by his reputation, and other examples. Then, finally, a really difficult one: “But one who reads Torah and learns Mishnah and serves Torah scholars, but his business practices are not done faithfully and he does not speak pleasantly with other people, what do people say about him? Woe to so-and-so who studied Torah, woe to his father who taught him Torah, woe to his teacher who taught him Torah. So-and-so who studied Torah, see how destructive are his deeds and how ugly are his ways.” (Tractate Yoma 86a)

There it is, the person who disgraces G-d’s name and struggles when seeking repentance on Yom Kippur. This is because, despite a clear road map of how to behave, he got very lost on his way.

All of the examples touch on how we behave in community, and how it reflects on us and affects others. Shaming oneself or harming others disgraces G-d’s name because, well, we’re all made in G-d’s image. We should know better.

Many of us are still taking summer adventures, but it was helpful for me to read about finding one’s way more existentially, and to consider Yom Kippur. It had remarkable relevance to something else that happened.

Recently, we were involved in what would have been a big real estate purchase for our household. My kids and husband were very excited. We made tons of plans and, like the careful tourists we are, we had the routes on our “roadmaps” highlighted. We knew which steps we had to get through, and how to proceed. This was to be our summer adventure.

However, the experience proved far more challenging than usual – and no map would have helped. In the end, we learned that the seller’s finances were so tangled and she owed so much money that the sale couldn’t go through. Like the story in Tractate Yoma, it felt embarrassing and upsetting. It’s hard to see a person fall off the path that most of us expect to take.

We don’t think of closing an open construction permit or paying property tax bills as being central to our life journeys. Yet, just like the poor behaviour that caused G-d to get angry at the Israelites, sometimes our missteps cause a lot of misery down the line, and to other people.

Being an upstanding person, who promptly pays bills and deals with the chores of adulthood, doesn’t just reflect on one’s own character. As the rabbis pointed out, behaving properly avoids embarrassing others or setting a bad example. It reminds us to talk about “Torah,” or generally upright things. We should apply what we learn – to behave kindly and ethically towards others all the time.

When someone doesn’t do this, it’s not just an issue of seeking individual repentance and everything is fixed. The ramifications go beyond an individual’s bad behaviour. It turns out that not paying taxes or taking care of household maintenance affects many others nearby in a community.

When this failed real estate deal happened, it wasn’t our fault. It felt, I explained to my parents, like we’d put our car in a parking lot with an invisible sinkhole. When the sinkhole opened up, all the cars, including ours, fell in. When we got to the (imagined) parking lot, all was lost, but there was nothing we could have done. We couldn’t have known that this experience would derail us from our journey.

I can’t lie. Being thrown off the highlighted route was disconcerting. I kept thinking about how the car’s GPS voice says “recalculating” when we’re driving and get lost. It’s taken me nearly a week to process the failed home purchase. Now, we must create a new metaphorical summer destination, with fun activities for our kids.

We can’t always control our path. Maybe that’s why those platitudes mention “the journey” instead. While we focus on our destination, the lake or camping or a staycation, it’s so important to think about how we behave and live along the way. Our actions can affect everybody.

I took a long walk with my dog on Shabbat, and spoke with three separate neighbours. They all needed the company and the conversation. Was this one of my new stops, on an entirely different path?

The Israelites wandered 40 years to get to the Promised Land. Sometimes, the things we do along the way are the most important part after all.

Joanne Seiff has written regularly for CBC Manitoba and various Jewish publications. She is the author of three books, including From the Outside In: Jewish Post Columns 2015-2016, a collection of essays available for digital download or as a paperback from Amazon. Check her out on Instagram @yrnspinner or at joanneseiff.blogspot.com.

Posted on July 23, 2021July 21, 2021Author Joanne SeiffCategories Op-EdTags COVID-19, Judaism, lifestyle, planning, real estate, Talmud, TripTiks

Action over words needed most

Action over words was what was most needed at this week’s National Summit on Antisemitism, hosted by the federal government. That was the consensus at a July 14 townhall in the lead-up to the summit. Hosted by the Centre for Israel and Jewish Affairs (CIJA), the virtual meeting drew about 1,300 Canadian Jews, some of whom expressed outright fear at spiraling antisemitism in their communities and on campuses.

The July 21 summit, and one on Islamophobia the following day, were announced earlier this month by Bardish Chagger, minister of diversity and inclusion, in the wake of a surge in antisemitic incidents this spring and the hate-driven murder of a Muslim family in London, Ont.

Addressing the townhall, Chagger listed Liberal achievements on fighting antisemitism, including Canada’s adoption in 2019 of the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance (IHRA) working definition of antisemitism, and the appointment last November of former justice minister and human rights advocate Irwin Cotler as Canada’s first special envoy on preserving Holocaust remembrance and combating antisemitism.

In a statement announcing the summits, Chagger said invitations to attend were extended to her cabinet colleagues, members of Parliament “and officials throughout all orders of government to hear directly from Muslim and Jewish community leaders.”

The meetings were to assemble “a diverse group of community and political leaders, academics, activists and members with intersectional identities within these communities.”

Both summits were to be held virtually and take place “in a closed door environment to ensure the safety of those participating,” a spokesperson for Chagger told The CJN.

Live-streaming details had not been confirmed by press time, and a list of invitees had not yet been finalized, the spokesperson said, adding, though, that the federal Anti-Racism Secretariat is working directly with “community stakeholders,” while Chagger is working with MPs “to ensure a wide range of voices are represented” at the summit.

Cotler, who was to co-chair the national summit with Chagger, pulled no punches at the townhall, warning of an “old-new, global, escalating, virulent, sophisticated, and even lethal antisemitism” that reached “a tipping point” during the Israel-Hamas war in May.

He pointed out that last year saw the highest levels of antisemitic hate crimes since being measured, and that those numbers have already been eclipsed this year.

He cited “incendiary” antisemitic hate on social media, where, in one week this past spring, there were 17,000 tweets saying “Hitler was right,” or some variation of it. This makes the national summit “as timely as it is necessary.”

Cotler said the framework for an action plan would have to include a mandate to teach about the Holocaust and antisemitism in public schools; enhancing the adoption and implementation of the IHRA definition of antisemitism; fighting all hate crimes; holding social media platforms accountable for their content; zero tolerance of antisemitism in any political party; and to “appreciate that Jews alone cannot fight antisemitism. We need a constituency of conscience and of action.”

The summit was to provide “not only an opportunity to address antisemitism in words, but it must be what it is intended to be: an action summit, where words are translated into action, and not as a one-time [event] but as an ongoing combating of the scourge of antisemitism.”

An informal poll conducted during the townhall suggested that most respondents believe Jewish university students will feel excluded when they return to class this fall. Another poll during the townhall had 25% of respondents saying the rise of antisemitism here has caused them to consider leaving Canada, while a third question revealed that 39% of those answering said they have recently removed outward signs of their Jewish identity, such as Stars of David and kippot.

One participant spoke of keeping his passport up to date and handy just in case, while others wondered about the role governments can play in fighting antisemitism.

In his remarks to the townhall, Shimon Koffler Fogel, chief executive officer of CIJA, noted that what distinguishes the challenge Jews face is that they face hatred “from all sides”: the far left, far right, and from segments of the Muslim community.

“We have to challenge where necessary. We have to educate where the opportunity exists. But what we cannot do is surrender. We cannot be passive,” Fogel said.

The national summit’s focus was to be security and public safety, education and “civil society – issues of inclusion, acceptance, of not invalidating or delegitimizing the Jewish lived experience. We want the capacity to take increased ownership of our own institutional and community safety and security,” said Fogel.

He also hopes the summit will lead to a national campaign to enhance social media literacy. What’s most important, he added, is to see all levels of government work together to combat antisemitism. The “unprecedented” summit is not the end of the process, Fogel said. “If anything, it is simply the beginning.”

B’nai Brith Canada said it received in advance ideas for discussion at this week’s summit. They included:

  • Combating antisemitism must go beyond the principles enshrined in the federal Anti-Racism Strategy;
  • An emphasis on the importance of fostering Jewish life in Canada, recognizing the historical and contemporary contributions of Canadian Jews;
  • Promoting positive narratives about the contribution of the Jewish community to Canadian society;
  • Recognition that new forms of antisemitism are distinct from the traditional antisemitism to which Canadians are more accustomed;
  • Acknowledgement that anti-Zionism is a main driver of the new antisemitism and must be vigorously countered;
  • A commitment to mainstream the fight against antisemitism across all federal departments and agencies. This would include the Canadian Human Rights Commission and, by extension, involve provincial human rights commissions;
  • A commitment to create a national Holocaust, genocide and antisemitism advisory commission;
  • A commitment to implement the IHRA definition of antisemitism (and the IHRA definition of Holocaust denial and distortion) in a meaningful way and to actively promote adoption by the provinces/territories and municipalities;
  • And a commitment to convening a special forum and ongoing dialogue with the Council of Ministers of Education Canada to work with schools to develop effective methods to combat antisemitism.

In a statement, Michael Levitt, chief executive officer of Friends of Simon Wiesenthal Centre, also stressed that it’s important the summit “leads to real action, not words, including clear and defined next steps and funding to support initiatives to combat Jew-hatred, whether it’s in education, law enforcement, social media or another area.”

The townhall took place just as the Inter-Parliamentary Task Force to Combat Online Antisemitism released an interim report on how social media giants should handle online hate. Read more about it in Janice Arnold’s story for The CJN, which can be found at thecjn.ca/international-lawmakers-urge-action-on-online-anti-semitism.

– For more national Jewish news, visit thecjn.ca

Posted on July 23, 2021July 21, 2021Author Ron Csillag and Steve Arnold THE CJNCategories NationalTags Bardish Chagger, Canada, Irwin Cotler, National Summit on Antisemitism, The CJN

CHW empowers victims

COVID-19 isn’t the only global pandemic to worry about; the worldwide increase in domestic violence has been coined a “shadow pandemic” by the United Nations. Globally, an estimated one in three women lives with violence and fear. But the number of domestic violence complaints in Israel, for example, has increased by 800% since the beginning of COVID. True to its mission, Canadian Hadassah-WIZO (CHW) is leading the way to empower women by stepping up emergency support and services at this critical time.

CHW strongly believes that every human being deserves the right to achieve their full potential, while living in safety and security. CHW appointed its first chief executive officer, Lisa Colt-Kotler, who is spearheading a transition and new direction for the 100-year-old organization, with a history of support for women and children in Israel and Canada. This summer, CHW is launching a quadruple matching 24-hour crowdfunding campaign and proceeds will help empower victims of domestic violence.

image - S.O.S. – Starting Over Safely logoCHW’s summer campaign, S.O.S. – Starting Over Safely, has three priorities for projects in Israel: CHW Youth Villages, which provide a safe haven for at-risk adolescents and supports mental health through a variety of outlets; Essential Kits for Families, which provides the basic necessities needed to help each family start over safely after they leave an emergency shelter; and the Safety Net Program, which will empower women and their children by providing housing, financial help, social and personal support, employment support, and a network of other women in similar circumstances. Safety Net has nearly a 100% success rate of breaking the cycle of violence and preventing victims from re-entering a domestic abuse relationship.

Aug. 24-25, funds donated will be matched three more times by a loyal community of donors recognized as “Matching Heroes.” During the 24-hour campaign, which kicks off at noon in each centre across Canada, each gift donated on the website chwsos.ca will be quadrupled.

And, on Aug. 24, at 5 p.m. PST, CHW is hosting a free, star-studded, 90-minute virtual telethon experience during which viewers will learn more about how to help empower victims of domestic violence. To watch, just click on the link from the campaign website.

For more details, contact Irena Karshenbaum, CHW development officer for Western Canada, at [email protected] or 403-253-4612.

– Courtesy CHW

Posted on July 23, 2021July 21, 2021Author CHWCategories NationalTags CHW, domestic violence, fundraising, philanthropy, tikkun olam, women
JNF supports ALUT

JNF supports ALUT

(screenshot)

For this year’s Negev campaign, JNF Pacific Region has partnered with ALUT, the Israeli Society for Autistic Children, to renovate Aviv House, one of the first lifetime living facilities established by ALUT. ALUT has built and operates 18 “Homes for Life” in Israel, residences for individuals with autism who require supported living, that allow the residents to become integrated into the community to the greatest degree possible and provide for lifetime care in a family-type setting.

Aviv House (Beit Aviv) was established in 1992 in Jerusalem and the 14 residents have been living there since its inception. Their ages currently range from 35 to 49, and they all require assistance in almost all aspects of everyday life.

The physical house, now well over half-a-century old, is showing its age and has reached the point of risk. For example, the walls are crumbling and the sewage lines are regularly clogged; the building is not wheelchair accessible.

For more information and to watch a video from the campaign’s honorary co-chairs, Penny Sprackman and David Goldman, visit facebook.com/jnfvancouver. You can also contact the JNF office at 604-257-5155 or [email protected].

Format ImagePosted on July 23, 2021July 21, 2021Author JNF Pacific RegionCategories LocalTags ALUT, autism, David Goldman, fundraising, Jewish National Fund, JNF Pacific Region, Negev campaign, Penny Sprackman, philanthropy
Haas talks acting and BGU

Haas talks acting and BGU

Israeli actor Shira Haas was the featured guest at the Canadian Associates of Ben Gurion University of the Negev’s virtual gala July 7. (photo by Shula Klinger)

On July 7, the Canadian Associates of Ben Gurion University of the Negev held their second virtual fundraising gala. More than 1,200 participants logged on to the An “Unorthodox” National Virtual Gala event, which raised $850,000 for brain research at BGU’s Zlotowski Centre for Neuroscience.

The Zlotowski Centre is a group of researchers dedicated to finding cures and management tools for neurodegenerative diseases including Parkinson’s, Alzheimer’s, ALS and epilepsy.

photo - As part of the gala event, attendees received a special dinner package
As part of the gala event, attendees received a special dinner package. (photo by Shula Klinger)

Months in the making, the virtual gala was the work of a countrywide team of BGU staffers and numerous volunteers. Every participating household in Metro Vancouver received sweet and savoury kosher treats from Café 41. The accompanying gift box also brought olive oil from the Negev, a copy of Deborah Feldman’s memoir, Unorthodox: The Scandalous Rejection of My Hasidic Roots (Simon & Schuster, 2012), appetizer dishes and a commemorative cutting board.

Danny Chamovitz, BGU’s president, spoke about the work of BGU’s academics in general, in disciplines ranging from public health to brain research. Canadian Senator Linda Frum conducted the feature interview – with multiple-award-winning actor Shira Haas.

Describing herself as “very, very shy” as a young person, Haas said she had considered psychology or graphic design as professions, until a casting director approached her on Facebook. Sixteen years old at the time, she said, with respect to that first project, “I understood that this is what I want to do, it was like the door to Narnia.”

Haas does not take her success or popularity for granted. “It was always a dream to work internationally, in different languages, for different audiences, but I never imagined it,” she said. “It was always about the work. I am very, very lucky to be in this position.” She added, “My parents deserve to be talked about! They are the most supportive and amazing parents.”

Known for taking on demanding roles, Haas approaches acting in a scholarly fashion. She studied musculoskeletal diseases to play a terminally ill woman in the film Asia, and researched Russian, Yiddish and Charedi culture for the series Shtisel and Unorthodox. She said she finds beauty in hard work, explaining that Asia was “challenging in the most beautiful way. It was a lot of physical and emotional work, and very personal for me.”

When playing a part, Haas said she is motivated by two things. First, she must be passionate about the role because “that’s what brings everything alive.” About Shtisel, she said, “I fell in love with it immediately.”

Her second principle is to portray “subjects that matter to me.”

Haas’s idealism was evident in the way she spoke about Asia. “It’s not really about death,” she said. “It’s about relationships, about appreciating the time we have and what we do with it. The highest form of art is to bring light to the darkness.”

About Unorthodox, she said, “It didn’t occur to me that it is about the Orthodox world. It was just a story about people who want to be loved, their doubts, desires and failures.”

And Shtisel, she noted, had a huge impact on people all over the world. The show helped change people’s view of Orthodox communities, she said: “It’s universal.”

Of her forthcoming portrayal of Golda Meir in her early years, Haas described a woman with “a very interesting life. She was very passionate, with many dreams and desires.”

Since David Ben-Gurion and Golda Meir were friends, she laughed, “this event was meant to be!”

Haas spoke of her personal connection to BGU. Her sister studied at the university and a close friend is there now. Haas wanted to participate in the gala for several reasons, including, she said, “I am Jewish, I am an Israeli. I want to keep on doing events like this! I am even more proud to do it for Ben-Gurion.”

As for the brain research being conducted at BGU, which the gala funds will support, there has already been groundbreaking progress. Claude Broski’s group has identified a protein that can slow down the degeneration brought on by Parkinson’s. The social robots developed by Shelley Levy-Tzedek and her team will have an impact on stroke patient recovery – the robots offer motivation, feedback and performance-tracking during the rehabilitation phase. Epilepsy researchers are developing wearable hardware and software that could alert patients to an oncoming seizure, an hour before it happens. And Deborah Toiber’s Alzheimer’s team is exploring questions about brain aging, such as, Why does the disease affect so many of us, when only 5% of cases are genetic?

David Berson, executive director of CABGU, British Columbia and Alberta, said, “It has been very gratifying to see how the Metro Vancouver community has embraced BGU students and faculty in recent years. Many new supporters have stepped forward during the last year to engage with us. We are especially grateful to our community partners, who helped us promote this Unorthodox event.”

Among the many contributors to the gala were board members Jay Eidelman and Si Brown. Rachelle Delaney helped Berson with the goodie boxes at the crack of dawn on July 7, while volunteer drivers delivered the boxes. Adrian Cantwell and I were co-chairs for the Metro Vancouver team.

Shula Klinger is an author and journalist living in North Vancouver. She was Metro Vancouver co-chair of the CABGU gala with Adrian Cantwell.

Format ImagePosted on July 23, 2021July 21, 2021Author Shula KlingerCategories WorldTags acting, Ben-Gurion University, BGU, CABGU, Camp David Accords, fundraising, gala, healthcare, philanthropy, science, Shira Haas, Zlotowski Centre

Posts pagination

Previous page Page 1 … Page 194 Page 195 Page 196 … Page 650 Next page
Proudly powered by WordPress