B’nai B’rith

Sar-El faces a legal challenge

The Canadian arm of an Israeli organization that provides volunteers for the Israel Defence Forces (IDF) is facing a legal challenge to show that it does not violate Canadian law.

Sar-El Canada is slated to go to court in Toronto on Nov. 23 to argue that it does not violate the Foreign Enlistment Act.

The act states that “any person who, within Canada, recruits or otherwise induces any person or body of persons to enlist or to accept any commission or engagement in the armed forces of any foreign state or other armed forces operating in that state, is guilty of an offence.”

Sar-El Canada sends 100 to 150 volunteers a year from this country to Israel, the group’s national president, Jeff Sarfin, told the CJN. He said the organization had received nothing in writing about the legal challenge, and would issue a statement when it does.

Sarfin said those behind the legal challenge “are well-known anti-Israel activists known to cause trouble” and that “we consider this a non-issue.”

The case is the latest salvo from David Mivasair, a Hamilton, Ont.-based rabbi with a long history of activism targeting Israel, who called Vancouver home for many years.

Mivasair is joined on the private prosecution by Rehab Nazzal, a Palestinian-born, Toronto-based artist who was shot in the leg in Bethlehem in 2015 while photographing an IDF “skunk” truck, a non-lethal weapon used for crowd control.

A statement issued Sept. 28, by lawyer John Philpot, claimed that Sar-El Canada “acted as an intermediary to recruit or induce individuals to volunteer in a non-combatant role with the Israeli military. It is further alleged that, once in Israel, volunteers would reside on military bases, wear military uniforms and complete tasks that would otherwise be assigned to soldiers. These tasks allegedly included (but were not limited to) packing food rations or medical kits, cleaning tanks, painting helmets, radio repairs, and gas mask refurbishment.”

On Sept. 22, a justice of the peace approved a private prosecution against Sar-El, compelling the organization to appear in court in November.

“This will be only a first appearance, and there are a number of preliminary stages that the case will need to pass through before a trial date can be scheduled,” Shane Martinez, one of the lawyers representing Mivasair and Nazzal, told the CJN.

Recruiting in Canada for volunteers to assist the Israeli military “ought to be a concern of all Canadians,” Mivasair stated in a press release. He said the matter was brought to the attention of the federal government and the Toronto Police Service and “they both failed to act. We felt obliged to bring this prosecution as a civic duty to ensure respect for the rule of law.”

None of the allegations have been tested in court.

According to the Ontario courts’ website, a private prosecution is a legal process in which a person who has reasonable grounds to believe that someone has committed a criminal offence seeks to have the person charged and brought to court. The Foreign Enlistment Act is not part of the Criminal Code but criminal proceedings arising from it are “subject to and governed by the Criminal Code.” The act sanctions fines and imprisonment for those found guilty.

Sar-El Canada’s parent organization in Israel was established 40 years ago. Sar-El (a Hebrew acronym for “Service for Israel”) was originally set up to provide volunteer labour to farmers who were called up for military service, so their crops wouldn’t fail.

Sar-El operates in more than 30 countries and has to date sent some 160,000 volunteers to Israel to provide “broad logistical support to the IDF,” its website says. Volunteering takes place on IDF bases throughout Israel.

According to Sar-El, programs offer volunteers an opportunity to live and work beside Israeli soldiers and gain an insider view of Israel. Working alongside soldiers and base employees, the “non-combat civilian support duties” encompass packing medical supplies, repairing machinery and equipment; and cleaning, painting and maintaining the base.

The Sar-El program “is a morale booster and motivator for the soldiers,” the group’s website states.

David Matas, senior legal counsel for B’nai Brith Canada, said there “is no particular reason” the complainants in the Sar-El case should bring the matter forward. Typically, victims begin a private prosecution because they feel they have been ignored or turned away by police or the Crown.

The complainants in this case “do not identify as victims of any particular act of Sar-El volunteers. None of them personally claims to have suffered a loss as a result of what a Sar-El volunteer has done.”

The Foreign Enlistment Act, meantime, does not intend to include those who are not members of the armed forces. Sar-El volunteers “do not become members of the Israel Defence Forces [and] do not enlist in the Israel Defence Forces,” Matas told the CJN. “They are non-member support for the forces.”

Matas said the Crown can intervene in a private prosecution to stay a case, and that it would be “appropriate” for that to happen in this matter.

He pointed out that Ukraine has openly called for soldiers from around the world to join the fight against Russia. Oleskandr Shevchenko, Ukraine’s consul general in Toronto, told the National Post that “hundreds” of Canadians got in touch to offer assistance.

Allowing the Sar-El prosecution to proceed “would create an arbitrary situation where help for Israel is prosecuted and help for other states under armed threat is not,” Matas said.

In a related recent development, Canada’s justice ministry dismissed a petition that had called on the Liberal government to prosecute those who recruit and encourage recruiting for the IDF.

The petition singled out the Israeli consulate in Toronto, which had advertised “on several occasions an IDF representative available for personal appointments for those wishing to join the IDF, not just those who are required to do mandatory service.”

The petition was initiated by Mivasair and presented to the House of Commons in August 2021 by Hamilton NDP MP Matthew Green, but it died on the order paper when Parliament was dissolved for the federal election that followed.

Green reintroduced the petition this past June. On Sept. 22, the justice ministry replied that responsibility for the investigation and prosecution of offences under the Foreign Enlistment Act “rests with independent law enforcement and prosecution services.”

The campaign against the IDF’s recruitment of non-Israeli citizens in Canada began two years ago when several groups and some 170 prominent Canadians asked justice minister David Lametti to investigate the issue.

Israel’s Toronto consulate decried the action as part of a campaign “that attempts to smear the state of Israel and undermine [its] steadfast alliance with Canada.”

Israel’s consulate in Montreal at the time noted that consular services it provides are reserved for Israeli citizens and do not apply to non-Israelis who volunteer for the IDF.

At a news conference in October 2020, Lametti said Israeli diplomats serving in Canada “must follow Canadian law.” He referred the matter to the RCMP, which did not return calls and emails from the CJN seeking an update on the file.

Last year, Mivasair and Palestinian activist Khaled Mouammar asked the Canada Revenue Agency to investigate the Toronto-based Canadian Zionist Cultural Association for allegedly supporting the IDF.

Last May, following Israel’s brief war with Gaza, Mivasair was charged with one count of mischief after red paint, meant to symbolize Palestinian blood shed, was dumped onto the steps of the building housing Israel’s Toronto consulate. The charge was withdrawn in January.

– For more national Jewish news, visit thecjn.ca

Controversy over instructor

A proposed fall semester course at the University of Victoria has raised concerns that it will become what B’nai Brith Canada described as “a forum for antisemitism.” The concerns were sparked by inflammatory comments the course’s instructor, Dr. Shamma Boyarin, wrote on social media earlier in the year.

In a May 26 Twitter post, for example, Boyarin used an obscene verb before labeling Abraham Foxman, former president of the Anti-Defamation League, a “Zionist pig.” On June 3, he ridiculed an individual who had been the recipient of a torrent of antisemitic abuse online. This was followed the next day by a post in which Boyarin remarked, “[It’s] hard for North American Jews to admit the truth: What is happening in Israel is ethnic cleansing and slow genocide.”

An online description of the UVic course, entitled Introduction to Antisemitism, has been modified since it was first posted. At an earlier stage, the description began, “What is antisemitism? As soon as one attempts definitions, it becomes clear that even the most fundamental aspects of antisemitism are controversial.” The course’s current title is also different from the original, which was Towards an Understanding of Antisemitism. Gone, too, is a study of present-day antisemitism.

photo - Prof. Shamma Boyarin — Prof. Shamma Boyarin *(photo from uvic.ca)*

The changes occurred in early August after B’nai Brith, among others, raised objections to UVic about Boyarin teaching a class on modern antisemitism. The course’s subtitle on the UVic website now reads, “A Historical Survey of Key Texts and Moments from Augustine to Luther.” Its description: “What is antisemitism? The term itself was coined in the late 19th century, but when does the phenomenon begin? Is it the same or different from ‘anti-Judaism’? Should we spell it ‘anti-Semitism’ or ‘antisemitism’? Beginning with these basic questions, we will focus on the particular role Christianity has played in developing and sustaining antisemitism in Europe.”

“Moving this course away from modern antisemitism is an important first step,” said Michael Mostyn, chief executive officer of B’nai Brith Canada. “However, we are still concerned that, instead of educating students on the scourge of Jew-hatred, there is a risk, albeit a reduced one, that hostility toward Jews will instead be promoted.

“UVic must provide assurances to the Jewish community that academic freedom will not be used as cover to falsely accuse Jews, as a whole, of contributing to genocide, among other antisemitic canards,” he added.

When contacted by the Independent, UVic expressed the position that it “does not condone antisemitism” and “that it is highly committed to equity, diversity and inclusion and to social justice in its many forms.”

“We are aware that a faculty member has expressed personal views in public communications which are disturbing to people. Those views are personal. They have not been made on behalf of the university or in the context of their work,” said Karen Johnston, a spokesperson for the university.

“Canadians have a constitutional right to free speech, subject to limits under the law,” she said. “And so it cannot be the role of the university to judge or censor its employees’ exercise of free speech in their private lives. While all faculty enjoy the privilege of academic freedom, there are also limitations to this right. In this specific instance, there is no evidence at this time that the faculty member has or will exceed those limitations in teaching this course.”

The university also said it “will act on any allegation that there has been a violation of university policies against discrimination or harassment, which apply to all members of our community.”

Rob Philipp, executive director at Hillel BC, has been monitoring the situation and has spoken with Dr. Kevin Hall, the president of UVic. Philipp said, “If the course does run, we will check to see what the reading material is and what is being taught.” However, he added, while the organization is keeping on top of things, there is not much that can be done to stop the course from going ahead.

Jeff Kushner, president of the Jewish Federation of Victoria and Vancouver Island (JFVVI), said they, too, will be following the UVic course and will remain in contact with senior administration staff.

“The JFVVI does not have any serious concerns about the course material, such as we know it,” said Kushner. “Our concerns are more about the academic and emotional safety of the students enrolled in the course. In this particular case, a professor at UVic made some very objectionable comments on his private Twitter feed. We wish that he had not made such incorrect and inflammatory statements, both in his role as an academic and as a Jew.

“He has not made these comments in any official capacity, and the university has been very clear that these objectionable views are not the views of the university. Our concern is that an individual having these views, and expressing them as he has, may find it difficult to leave them at the classroom door and, through explicit statements or implicit actions, may create an unsafe learning environment for Jewish students holding views contrary to his own.”

In a letter to the university, B’nai Brith urged UVic to publish the syllabus of the revised course online, to cancel the course if it is used to attack the Jewish community in any way and to follow other universities, such as Oxford and Cambridge, in adopting the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance Working Definition of Antisemitism to “avoid future confusion.”

Boyarin has taught at the University of Victoria since 2008 in religious studies and medieval studies, and in the English department since 2009. According to his profile at UVic, his current research and teaching interests include medieval literature (particularly the literature of Spain and the Near East), comparative literature (particularly Hebrew and Arabic), literature and religion, Jewish studies, and the religious roots of antisemitism. He has additional expertise, his profile continues, in the connections between medieval and contemporary culture, especially as they manifest in heavy metal music and white supremacist ideologies.

The Independent tried to reach Boyarin for comment, but had not heard back from him at the time of publication.

Sam Margolis has written for the Globe and Mail, the National Post, UPI and MSNBC.

קנדה מתחילה לחסן את התושבים

(photo: 2018 © Qapta.es)

ממשלת קנדה מתחילה בימים אלה להפעיל את מערך המסובך והמורכב של החיסון נגד נגיף הקורונה. מדובר בחיסון של ענקית התרופות האמריקנית פייזר וחברת הטכנולוגיות הגרמנית ביונטק. קנדה הייתה אפוא המדינה השנייה בעולם שהעניקה אישור רגולטורי לשימוש בחיסון של פייזר וביונטק, ועוד לפני ארצות הברית.

רשויות הבריאות של קנדה העניקו ביום רביעי בשבוע שעבר את האישור לשימוש בחיסון לנגיף קורונה של החברות פייזר וביונטק. הלת’ קנדה – הסוכנות האחראית על הרגולציה של תרופות, פרסמה הודעה רשמית באתר האינטרנט שלה כי החיסון יעיל ובטוח לשימוש. קנדה צפויה לקבל כמאתיים וחמישים אלף מנות חיסון של פייזר ויביונטק במהלך חודש זה (דצמבר), ועוד כארבע מיליון מנות חיסון עד חודש מרץ שנה הבאה.

האישור ניתן במסגרת מדיניות זמנית (חדשה) שמאפשרת אישור מואץ של תרופות. זאת, בדומה לאישורי החירום שמעניק האף.די.אי – מינהל המזון והתרופות של ארה”ב. אגב הסוכנות האמריקנית העניקה את האישור שלה לשימוש בחיסון של פייזר ויביונטק בסוף השבוע האחרון.

אישור לחיסון נסמך על ראיות לכך שהוא בטוח, יעיל ובאיכות טובה, כתבה הסוכנות הלת’ קנדה. יצוין כי ממשלת קנדה הליברלית בראשות ראש הממשלה, ג’סטין טרודו, רכשה בסך הכל עשרים מיליון מנות מהחיסון של פייזר וביונטק, המספיקות לחסן עשרה מיליון תושבים. לקנדה שמורה האופציה לרכוש חמישים ושש מיליון מנות חיסון נוספות מפייזר וביונטק. הסוכנות הקנדית הלת’ קנדה בוחנת בימים אלה עוד שלושה חיסונים אחרים, בהם החיסון של חברת מודרנה האמריקנית. חשוב לזכור שממשלת קנדה הזמינה יותר מנות חיסון לנפש מכל מדינה אחרת בעולם.

פקידים קנדים אמרו כי במסגרת הסכם הרכישה עם פייזר וביונטק, מנות החיסון לא יכלו להישלח לקנדה עד לקבלת האישור – שכאמור התקבל בשבוע שעבר. טרודו מצידו אמר כי קנדה תחל לקבל את המשלוח הראשון כבר בשבוע זה, בכפוף לקבלת האישור של הלת’ קנדה. רשויות הבריאות של עשר הפרובינציות ושלוש הטריטוריות של קנדה, יעניקו את החיסונים בחינם לתושביהן. רשויות הבריאות שלהן הן אלה שיחליטו באופן עצמאי איך יקוצו החיסונים בשטחים שלהן – כאשר בשלב זה מספר מנות החיסון של פייזר וביונטק הוא נמוך ביותר.

אונטריו: יוחלף השם של רחוב הקרוי על שמו של קצין נאצי

ארגון בני ברית קנדה ניהל מאבק ממושך במשך שנים, לשנות את שמו של רחוב בעיר אייקס שבמחוז אונטריו, הנושא את שמו של נאצי. למעלה מאלף חתימות הושגו על ידי בני ברית ומועצת העירייה הסכימה להתחיל בהליך לשינוי השם.

הרחוב שמעורר סערה באייאקס, קרוי עד היום על שמו של קצין חיל הים הנאצי, הנס לנגדורף. כאמור לאחר קמפיין ממושך של בני ברית קנדה אישרה מועצת העיר את החלפת השם. יצויין כי לישיבת מועצת העיר הגיע ניצול שואה שהעיד ממושכות על הזוועות של הנאצים.

נציג ארגון בני ברית בקנדה מייקל מוסטין, אמר בסיפוק כי אישור ההחלטה לשינוי שם הרחוב, דווקא בתקופה כזו של התגברות התפרצויות האנטישמיות בקנדה, מהווה בשורה וקרן אור.

קצת הסיטוריה: שהמייסדים של ארגון בני ברית היו שנים עשר מהגרים יהודים מגרמניה, שהקימו את הסניף הראשון בארצות הברית. מטרתם הייתה לאחד את עם ישראל באשר הוא נמצא. כיום הארגון פעיל במספר גדול של מדינות ברחבי העולם. הוא עוסק במגוון רחב של פעילויות חברתיות, רווחה, פעילות למען זכויות האדם, התנגדות למיסיון, והתנגדות לגזענות ואנטישמיות.

1,300 survivors found refuge

On Holocaust Remembrance Day, Jan. 27, B’nai Brith International (BBI) honoured former Philippine leader Manuel L. Quezon with a special panel discussion at the United Nations in New York City. BBI chief executive officer Dan Mariaschin is fifth from the right. (photo from BBI)

On Holocaust Remembrance Day, Jan. 27, B’nai Brith International (BBI) honoured a former Philippine leader at the United Nations building in New York, for having saved Jews during the Holocaust.

At a time when the Philippines was still under American sovereignty, the appointed Philippine president, Manuel L. Quezon, invited and welcomed 1,300 refugee Jews who were fleeing Nazi persecution.

Quezon, who was born in 1878 and died in 1944, was a statesman, soldier and politician. He served as president of the Commonwealth of the Philippines from 1935 to 1944.

According to Philippine Secretary of Foreign Affairs Teodoro Locsin, the reason why Quezon chose to help when many other world leaders refused to do so, is that he acted in the tradition of “Do unto others as you would have done unto you.”

Not only did Quezon welcome as many Jews as he could get visas for, he also offered them his private land to grow food and develop a kibbutz.

“I think it’s a case of, there are individuals who, I’m a firm believer in this, whose moment comes at the most opportune time,” said Daniel S. Mariaschin, BBI chief executive officer. “In the case of Manuel Quezon, I think he was a good-hearted individual. There was nothing in this for him.

“He really was a compassionate person who heard this story, thousands and thousands of miles away, and was moved to act. And now we are finding out, as more becomes known, that he was willing to save many, many more … and was, unfortunately, not able to do so. I think he stands very high … as one of the Righteous Among the Nations, who acted to save Jews.”

At that time, from 1937 to 1941, as news reports were revealing Hitler’s plans, Quezon secured the necessary visas from the American visa office for a Jewish-American family by the name of Frieder, who manufactured cigars in Manila.

Photo - Former Philippine President Manuel L. Quezon invited and welcomed 1,300 refugee Jews who were fleeing Nazi persecution — Former Philippine President Manuel L. Quezon invited and welcomed 1,300 refugee Jews who were fleeing Nazi persecution. *(photo from U.S. Library of Congress LC-USW33-019075-C)*

“I think the family, together with the president, were able to get word out, they were able to get those visas … although, again, unfortunately, when he wanted to save more, the ability to get more visas was just not available to him,” said Mariaschin.

Years later, the Philippines was the only Asian nation to vote for the Partition Plan in 1947, to form the state of Israel in 1948, which continued to pave the way for the positive relations Israel has with the Philippines to this day. In 2009, in Rishon Lezion, a monument was erected to honour Quezon.

The BBI event in January was well-attended and included remarks from Locsin, Mariaschin, historian Bonnie Harris, and Hank Hendrickson, who is the executive director of the U.S.-Philippines Society and a refugee who was personally saved by Quezon.

In between the various speakers, director Noel (Sunny) Izon, who made the documentary about Quezon called An Open Door: Holocaust Haven in the Philippines, shared a clip from the film. According to Izon, some 11,000 descendants of the refugees Quezon saved owe their life to him and Izon is one of them. He explained that one of the refugees Quezon saved was a doctor who saved his father’s life soon after arriving in Manila.

Another highlight of the January event was having refugee Ralph Preiss present. Preiss had been saved by Quezon, and shared his experience with attendees.

While no one from Quezon’s immediate family attended, nearly half the attendees were of Filipino descent who now live in New York.

Mariaschin said, while the event was in recognition of Quezon, it was, by extension, “in recognition of the Philippines.”

“The books, the films, the documentaries and the stories will live on from this point, forever,” said Mariaschin about other recent recognitions of Quezon’s actions. “That’s the best tribute you can have, that, rather than have this be just considered a footnote of history, it’s now becoming an important piece of the story … of the courageousness, the humanitarian impulses, of a relatively few individuals.”

According to Mariaschin, Quezon is on equal standing with the handful of other leaders who had a hand in saving Jews during the Second World War, and he said we need to continue highlighting their stories before we lose our few remaining survivors.

“I think we have to do this while there are still survivors who are living,” said Mariaschin. “Unfortunately, the clock is running down on that. In the lifetimes of those people who they saved, it’s extremely important that we say thank you.

“And we were fortunate, as I said, to have one refugee at our program, to have them say thank you and to talk about their story. It’s something that really we need to do every year now and in between, in order to memorialize those who saved Jews.”

Five years ago, the International Raoul Wallenberg Foundation posthumously bestowed Quezon with the Wallenberg Medal, which also acknowledged the Philippines as a whole for having saved Jews during the Holocaust. In Winnipeg, the local B’nai Brith branch is working to organize an event, together with the Winnipeg Filipino community, to honour the former president.

To view the video of the BBI event in New York, visit webtv.un.org and do a search for “Safe Haven: Jewish Refugees in the Philippines – Panel Discussion.”

Rebeca Kuropatwa is a Winnipeg freelance writer.

Mystery photo … Nov. 29/19

Group of B’nai Brith delegates at a Phoenix convention, 1975. Dave Jackson is on the left and Harry Buller is fifth from the left. (photo from JWB fonds, JMABC L.10220)

If you know someone in this photo, please help the JI fill the gaps of its predecessor’s (the Jewish Western Bulletin’s) collection at the Jewish Museum and Archives of B.C. by contacting [email protected] or 604-257-5199. To find out who has been identified in the photos, visit jewishmuseum.ca/blog.

Mystery photo … Oct. 26/18

B’nai B’rith event, 1969. (photo from JWB fonds, JMABC L.09488)

Tweets raise questions

Dimitri Lascaris, chair of the board of Canadians for Justice and Peace in the Middle East (CJPME), last week tweeted what is being condemned as a blatantly antisemitic swipe at two Jewish members of Parliament.

Despite CJPME’s name, the messaging from the group doesn’t indicate that the “justice and peace” they seek will be particularly just or peaceful for Jewish residents of the Middle East. What happened last week should clarify where the group – or at least its leader – stands.

“Apparently,” Lascaris tweeted, “Liberal MPs Anthony Housefather and Michael Levitt are more devoted to apartheid Israel than to their own Prime Minister and their own colleagues in the Liberal caucus.” The tweet was a bit of a non sequitur. Lascaris had posted on a different platform about a B’nai Brith Canada rally in Toronto, after which two women who had attended the event posted a video saying that Prime Minister Justin Trudeau should face the death penalty. Weirdness all around, certainly, but how Lascaris connected this incident with two Liberal MPs is an open question. Ultimately, whatever link there may be is irrelevant in the bigger context.

Accusing Jews of dual loyalties, of being “others” who are not fully of a society, is an age-old charge almost universally accepted as antisemitic at its core. Encouragingly, politicians of every stripe (as well as plenty of other Canadians) have tweeted or otherwise made clear their dismay at Lascaris’s comment.

The next move is up to members of the organization. If the members of CJPME reject their chair’s remarks and remove him from his role, they will have demonstrated that they understand something about justice. If not, Lascaris and the group he represents should be snubbed by elected officials and anyone with a genuine interest in peace and justice.

* * *

Another interesting tweet came from Tory Senator Linda Frum last week, in response to the announcement that Trudeau would issue an apology for the Canadian government’s refusal in 1939 to allow the MS St. Louis, carrying 907 Jewish refugees, to land in Canada. Forced to return to Europe, 254 of the passengers were murdered in the Holocaust.

“I’ve made this warning before: if Trudeau’s apology for Canada’s rejection of the ‘voyage of the damned’ compares Jews fleeing the Nazis to the contemporary crisis of illegal economic migrants, he will require an apology for his apology. Think carefully,” tweeted Frum.

Thinking carefully is indeed what everyone involved should do.

Leaving aside the criticism about the merits of historical apologies, which we have addressed in this space previously, Frum makes a useful point. To be heartfelt, the apology should stand on its own merits as the voice of a nation genuinely regretful about a scar on our national honour. The apology – scheduled for the week in November that marks the 80th anniversary of Kristallnacht – should be about the St. Louis, its passengers, the victims of Canada’s decision and perhaps the broader lesson of what was not done to aid the mortally endangered Jews of Europe. It should not be taken out of context through the universalizing of the story. That the passengers on the ship were Jews is absolutely critical to understanding the history of the St. Louis and our country’s history of institutionalized antisemitism.

At the same time, what is the point of these apologies, or any commemoration of a past wrong, if we do not learn and apply the lessons to the choices we make in our world today? There is a fine line to walk in respecting the individuality of the St. Louis, on the one hand, and ensuring that the apology and associated discussion results in positive changes in our approach to current and future issues we must confront.

Regrettably, Frum threw an additional wrench in the works with her use of the term “illegal economic migrants.” This is apparently a reference to the concern that some in her party and elsewhere have that the migrants who are entering Canada via the United States from Latin America are not legitimate refugees fleeing persecution or danger, but rather people simply seeking to advance the wealth and condition of their families. While it is fair to bring attention to the illegal crossings, it seems odd for a Conservative (or a conservative) to imply that there is something particularly disagreeable about a person seeking economic advancement, either through migration or other means.

That aside, the apology will almost certainly be welcomed by most Jewish Canadians. It will be an opportunity for Canadians to remember – and, for those who do not yet know, to learn – this history. Once we as a country have made what small penance we possibly can for this tragedy, there will be time to consider how contemporary events can be informed by what we learn from thinking about the St. Louis and its passengers. That is part of the purpose of this entire exercise.

Mystery photo … Aug. 31/18

B’nai B’rith, circa 1970. (photo from JWB fonds, JMABC L.09504)

אירועים אנטישמיים בטורונטו

תלונות הועברו למשטרת טורונטו בנוגע לסיטקרים האנטישמיים והפוסטרים להחרמת ‘ארומה’ והמוצרים מישראל. (צילום: booledozer)

ארגון בני ברית בטורונטו מדווח על התגברות האנטישמיות בעיר, ובפעילות להחרים מוסדות ישראלים ומוצרים ישראלים. לדברי הארגון סיטקרים אנטישמיים עם צלבי קרס והסלוגן: “צעירים נאצים נמצאים כאן” הודבקו לאחרונה, ברחבי טורונטו על עמודים ברחובות ובמקומות נוספים, בהם במסעדה. במקביל הודבקו פוסטרים להחרים את רשת בתי הקפה הישראלית ‘ארומה” ומוצרים מתוצרת ישראל.

תלונות הועברו למשטרת טורונטו בנוגע לסיטקרים האנטישמיים והפוסטרים להחרמת ‘ארומה’ והמוצרים מישראל.

לדברי בני ברית בשנת 2017 אירעו 1,752 אירועים אנטישמיים בקנדה, לעומת 1,728 ב-2016. בחלוקה לאזורים להלן ארבעת המחוזות המובילים: במקום הראשון אונטריו עם 808 מקרים, במקום השני קוויבק עם 474 מקרים, במקום השלישי אלבטרה עם 206 מקרים ובמקום הרביעי בריטיש קולומביה עם 165 מקרים.

הערים הטובות למגורים: ונקובר, טורונטו וקלגרי בעשירייה הראשונה

שבועון החדשות הבריטי האקונומיסט מדרג כמדי שנה את הערים הטובות בעולם למגורים. מאה ארבעים ערים דורגו לשנת 2017 על פי הפרמטרים הבאים: היציבות הכלכלית, רמת שירותי הבריאות, התרבות והסביבה, החינוך והתשתיות. כרגיל בשנים האחרונות ערים מקנדה ואוסטרליה שולטות בעשירייה הראשונה של הערים הטובות בעולם לחיות בהן. זאת על פי מחלקת המחקר של האקונומיסט.

הנה הן עשר הערים הטובות בעולם למגורים:

ראשונה-מלבורן (מאוסטרליה): בולטת בתחומי החינוך (ציון 100), התשתיות (ציון 100), רמת שירותי הבריאות (ציון 100), התרבות והסביבה (ציון 95.1), היציבות הכלכלית (ציון 95). הציון הכולל של מלבורן הוא: 97.5.

שנייה-וינה (מאוסטריה): בולטת בתחומי החינוך (ציון 100), התשתיות (ציון 100), רמת שירותי הבריאות (ציון 100), היציבות הכלכלית (ציון 95), התרבות והסביבה (ציון 94.4). הציון הכולל של וינה הוא: 94.4.

שלישית-ונקובר (מקנדה): בולטת בתחומי החינוך (ציון 100), רמת שירותי הבריאות (ציון 100), התרבות והסביבה (ציון 100), היציבות הכלכלית (ציון 95), התשתיות (ציון 92.9). הציון הכולל של ונקובר הוא: 97.3.

רביעית- טורונטו (מקנדה): בולטת בתחומי החינוך (ציון 100), רמת שירותי הבריאות (ציון 100), היציבות הכלכלית (ציון 100), התרבות והסביבה (ציון 98.1), התשתיות (ציון 96.4). הציון הכולל של טורונטו הוא: 97.2.

חמישית- קלגרי (מקנדה): בולטת בתחומי החינוך (ציון 100), רמת שירותי הבריאות (ציון 100), היציבות הכלכלית (ציון 100), התשתיות (ציון 96.4), התרבות והסביבה (ציון 89.1). הציון הכולל של קלגרי הוא: 96.6.

שישית-אדלייד (מאוסטרליה): בולטת בתחומי החינוך (ציון 100), רמת שירותי הבריאות (ציון 100), התשתיות (ציון 96.4), היציבות הכלכלית (ציון 95), התרבות והסביבה (ציון 94.2). הציון הכולל של אדלייד הוא: 96.6.

שביעית- פרת’ (מאוסטרליה): בולטת בתחומי החינוך (ציון 100), רמת שירותי הבריאות (ציון 100), התשתיות (ציון 100), היציבות הכלכלית (ציון 95), התרבות והסביבה (ציון 88.7). הציון הכולל של פרת’ הוא: 95.9.

שמינית-אוקלנד (מניו זינלנד): בולטת בתחומי החינוך (ציון 100), התרבות והסביבה (ציון 97), רמת שירותי הבריאות (95.8), היציבות הכלכלית (ציון 95), התשתיות (ציון 92.9). הציון הכולל של אוקלנד הוא: 95.7.

תשיעית-הלסינקי (מפינלנד): בולטת בתחומי רמת שירות הבריאות (ציון 100), היציבות הכלכלית (ציון 100), התשתיות (ציון 96.4), החינוך (ציון 91.7), התרבות והסביבה (ציון 88.7). הציון הכולל של הלסינקי הוא: 95.6.

עשירית-המבורג (מגרמניה): בולטת בתחומי רמת שירותי הבריאות (ציון 100), התשתיות (ציון 100), התרבות והסביבה (ציון 93.5), החינוך (ציון 91.7), היציבות הכלכלית (ציון 90). הציון הכולל של המבורג הוא: 95.

Mystery photo … May 18/18

B’nai B’rith, 1966. (photo from JWB fonds, JMABC L.09493)