Europe

אירופה וקנדה מתחממות עד להפחיד

חזרתי מביקור של שבועיים באירופה במהלך חודש יוני והופתעתי לרעה עד כמה היה חם ביבשת זו. הביקור כלל את הערים ציריך שוויץ ואמסטרדם הולנד. לא חשבתי כלל שכבר בחודש יוני החום בערים אלה יהיה גבוה מאוד וממש בלתי נסבל

דווקא באמסטרדם אותה אני מכיר היטב ובעבר הרביתי לטייל בה החום הפעם העיק בצורה קשה והגביל את תנועתי. במקום לצאת מהמלון בשעות הבוקר ולחזור בחשיכה נאלצנו בתי זוגתי ואנוכי לחזור מדי צהריים למלון, כדי לנוח מהחום הקשה, להתקלח וליהנות קצת מהמזגן, עד היציאה בערב. ובקיצור שעות לא מעטות בוזבזו על החדר במלון, במקום על הליכה בעיר

אל החום הכבד הצטרפה עם לחות גבוהה כך שהטמפרטות באמסטרדם עברו בקלות את רף השלושים מעלות. וזה לא נעים. בדרך כלל במדינות אירופה במרכז ובצפון שרר באביב מזג אוויר נוח, אך לא הפעם

פגשנו באמסטרדם לא מעט מקומיים שהתלוננו אף הם על החום הקשה שהם לא רגילים בו. במקרה אחת מלצרית בבית קפה עשתה טעות בחשבון שהוגש אלינו. להגנתה היא טענה שהחום אשם בכך

בביקור בציריך גם כן החום היה גבוה במיוחד ולצערנו במלון שם לא היה מזגן ולכן נאלצנו לפתוח את החלונות כמעט לכל אורך חמשת הימים שהיינו בו

אם החזרה לוונקובר פגשנו מזג אוויר נוח יותר שאפשר לנו חזרה קלה יותר לחיי היום יום והעבודה

אך לא שכחנו את המראות בחדשות באירופה על שריפות ענק בקנדה לאורכה ולרוחבה, שגרמו לאובך קשה מאוד גם בארצות הברית השכנה

השריפות שפשטו בקנדה במהלך יוני שרפו יחד כמעט אחד עשר מיליון דונם, שזה פי חמש עשרה מהשטח הממוצע הנשרף בתקופה הזו של השנה. בקוויבק לבדה כבר עלו באש יותר משני מיליון דונם. עונת השריפות הנוכחית היא חסרת תקדים בקנדה, לא רק בשל היקף השטח; היא החלה מוקדם במיוחד השנה, מספר מוקדי השריפה השונים הוא חסר תקדים, וגם מיקומן. בעוד שריפות יער במדינה בוערות בדרך כלל באזורים מרוחקים ודלים מאוכלוסייה, מאות מהן השנה בוערות גם סמוך לאוכלוסייה עירונית

בקנדה לא הצליחו לשלוט לבד בגובה הלהבות, ונאלצו להזעיק עזרה בינלאומית. כארבע מאות כבאים מצרפת, ארה”ב וספרד הגיעו לקוויבק. עשרות אלפים נאלצו להתפנות מבתיהם, ומעבר לגבול, ערים ובהן ניו יורק, וושינגטון די.סי ופילדלפיה חוו גם כמה מאיכות האוויר הגרועה ביותר שלהן זה שנים

בסך הכל ברחבי קנדה בערו כארבע מאות וחמישים שריפוץ. רוחות בדרך כלל נושאות עשן משריפות באזור קוויבק מזרחה והחוצה לים, אך אזור לחץ נמוך הוביל את העשן דרומה לארצות הברית. תחזית ממשלת קנדה מציבה את המדינה כולה בסיכון גבוה מהממוצע לשריפות בחודשי הקיץ, מאלברטה במערב ועד נובה סקוטיה על קו החוף האטלנטי

השריפות המשמעותיות בקנדה אינן אירוע בודד, וייתכן כי בעתיד אירועים אלו ילכו ויתגברו, וכך גם הנזק ההיקפי אותו הם גורמים. שינויי האקלים שנגרמו על ידי האדם מעלים את הסבירות לאירועי שריפות משמעותיים, שכן הם מתדלקים את תנאי מזג האוויר המניעים שריפות עוצמתיות. החום הגובר והבצורות המתמשכות הופכים סביבה רגישה יותר לשריפה, שכן טמפרטורות חמות יותר מתנדפות יותר לחות מהאדמה והצמחייה, מייבשות עצים, שיחים ועשבים והופכות נשורת עלים וענפים שהתייבשו על הקרקע לחומר בעירה. מדענים מזהירים שאירועים דוגמת השריפות בקנדה עתידים להמשיך לשבש את חיי היומיום ככל שכדור הארץ מתחמם וליצור את הסביבה האידאלית לשריפות קשות ותכופות יותר

Concerning elections

On Remembrance Day, we reflect on the sacrifices made by Canadians who fought to defend freedom. Many of us recall the solemnity of our childhoods standing in a school auditorium, first beginning to understand the meaning behind the poem “In Flanders Fields” and the moment of silence.

Similar ceremonies occur worldwide, including in places where the loss of life in wars has been far greater and more recent than our nation’s experience.

At the same time, it is impossible not to reflect on how some of the messages of tolerance, coexistence and peace seem to have been lost on leaders of various countries – as well as those who vote for them.

Across Europe, the Americas and some other places, extremism is growing. Far-right governments in Italy, Poland and Hungary advance xenophobic and scapegoating policies. While not yet reaching the highest echelons of power, far-right groups in Germany and France are growing in popularity. The defeat of Jair Bolsonaro, Brazil’s extreme-right and volatile president, is a bright spot, though the leftist Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva, who beat him only by a hair, demonstrated in his previous term as president that he is also no archetype of impeccable governance.

Enormously alarming were this week’s midterm elections in the United States. More than half of the Republican candidates for Congress and state offices, including crucial officials who oversee election processes, are “election deniers” who claim that the 2020 presidential race was not rightfully won by Joe Biden. The refusal of the former president to acknowledge defeat and accede to the peaceful transition of power, hand-in-hand with the insurrection at the Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021, represent the greatest threat to American democracy since that country’s Civil War. The last two years have shown how fragile this form of governance is and how dependent it is on the goodwill of its participants to abide by the rules and accept the will of the people. The fact that about half of American voters don’t seem the least bit bothered by this reality is the scariest part.

Then, and by no means least, are the results of Israel’s most recent national elections. The good news is that, after five elections in three years, the country will apparently have a stable coalition government. The bad news is that it will include individuals whose political and moral values should be scorned by people who support democracy, pluralism and respect. Itamar Ben-Gvir, leader of the third-largest bloc, was forbidden from serving in the Israel Defence Forces because military leaders deemed him too extreme. Until he decided to get serious about politics, Ben-Gvir had a framed photo in his home of Baruch Goldstein, the extremist who murdered 29 Palestinians in Hebron’s Cave of the Patriarchs in 1994. His policies include annexing the West Bank and forcibly expelling (at least some of) its residents, an idea that is, put mildly, against international law, and would almost certainly lead to a serious regional conflagration.

Israelis must deal with the situation they have created. Diaspora Jews and other supporters of Israel have a tough row to hoe as well.

Jewish organizations worldwide have issued unprecedented statements of concern and condemnation about internal Israeli affairs. There has always been tension, ranging from a low simmer to a full boil, between Israel and the Diaspora over a vast range of issues. Israelis, we must state, are the ones who put their lives, and those of their children, on the line to defend the Jewish state and they alone have the right to determine its direction. This does not mean, however, that the opinions and concerns of overseas family and allies do not matter.

Israel has always lacked dependable overseas allies. In far too many instances, this has been an unfair situation driven by geopolitical issues and, to an extent, bigotry and antisemitism. But Israel is not entirely blameless in its isolation. Decades ago, Golda Meir said, “I prefer to stay alive and be criticized than be sympathized.” Sometimes, Israel needs to make unpopular choices in the interest of its security.

There are moments when Israel’s hand has been forced, when its leaders have made choices that are unpopular among outside observers but deemed necessary for national security. This is not one of those moments. Israeli voters have chosen some extremely unsavoury people to represent them. They have sown the wind. It is the responsibility of decent people in Israel and abroad – including Jewish institutions – to advocate for tolerance and human rights in order to moderate the inevitable storm.

There remains darkness to light

A recent poll determined that a large number of Europeans hold views that are antisemitic and, at the same time, awareness about the Holocaust is decreasing.

More than 7,000 people were polled on behalf of the news network CNN. In each of seven countries – Austria, France, Germany, Hungary, Poland, Sweden and the United Kingdom – 1,000 people were surveyed.

One-third of those surveyed – and one in two respondents in Poland – stated that Jews exploit the Holocaust to advance their goals and that Israel uses the Holocaust as a tool to justify its policies.

One in 20 Europeans have never heard of the Holocaust. In Austria, 12% of respondents said they had never heard of it, while 40% admitted they know little about it.

About 40% of respondents in Poland and Hungary claim that Jews have too much influence on business and finances. One-third of Poles and Hungarians think Jews exert too much influence on global politics.

Other findings in the poll deliver a mixed bag. Half of respondents in all countries claimed to know “quite a lot” about the Holocaust, with 20% claiming to have “extensive knowledge.” Two-thirds of Europeans agree that commemorating the Holocaust helps ensure similar atrocities do not happen in future and half believes that Holocaust commemoration helps combat antisemitism today.

While Jewish people constitute about 0.2% of the total world population, 25% of Hungarians and 20% of Polish and British respondents believe that more than 20% of the world is Jewish.

The poll says that 54% of Europeans believe that Israel has a right to exist as a Jewish state. (One almost wishes they had been asked if France has a right to exist as a French country, or Poland as a Polish country.)

One-third of Europeans, according to the poll, believe that criticism of Israel is symptomatic of antisemitism, while 20% believe that it is not.

Deflecting blame for antisemitism away from its perpetrators and onto its victims, 28% of respondents contend that antisemitism in their respective countries is a direct response to Israel’s actions. Fully 18% of Europeans blame antisemitism on the behaviour of Jews themselves.

Polls like these are an important barometer of opinion. There is little in the results that will surprise anybody who has been paying attention to European developments in recent years. Previous surveys have indicated that Europeans (as well as North Americans and others) have what we would consider an inadequate grasp of the realities of the Holocaust. Likewise, nobody needed a survey to know that antisemitism in Europe is at a level unprecedented in recent decades. However, it is important to have empirical evidence like this, especially a survey that is both cross-national and includes enough respondents to make it statistically significant.

It would be no help at all to throw up one’s hands and declare Europe lost, as some people have done in recent days. But neither do we, in Canada, have all that much influence over what happens there.

We do, however, have the ability to influence things closer to home and we should redouble our efforts to ensure that trends in Europe are not transmitted to our shores. We are, by no means, immune to this kind of thinking. A similar study done in Canada or the United States would indicate some parallels with the European results, albeit, we hope, not to the deeply concerning degree that this study has indicated.

We must continue to support every area ofHolocaust education possible. The work being done at the Vancouver HolocaustEducation Centre and by organizations across Canada must be supported andstrengthened. As Prof. Jan Grabowski said in delivering the annual Vrba lecture(jewishindependent.ca/revealing-truth-elicits-threats), there is still verymuch primary research left to do about the Holocaust, unearthing basic detailsthat are still not recorded about that time in history.

On the front of combating antisemitism here, the Jewish community must continue being vigilant and raising alarms whenever antisemitic ideas or actions emerge because this work has fallen primarily to Jewish Canadians. We must continue to build strength through our allies in all the multicultural communities in the country. This is the surest method to combat the growth of antisemitism – and this has to be a two-way street. As a community, we must stand with other groups and individuals when they are unjustly targeted if we are to expect others to stand with us.

While the last lights of Chanukah our now extinguished, we still have the season of winter before us and it is our responsibility to continue bringing light where there is darkness.

Stories from Europe

Teaching Racism, which looks at discrimination against Roma in the Czech Republic, is one of nine videos currently comprising the Global Reporting Centre’s Strangers at Home project. (photo from strangers.globalreportingcentre.org)

Shayna Plaut has long been concerned with the plight of minorities in Europe. Her doctoral thesis focused on the Roma, and she has gone back and forth to Central and Eastern Europe to advocate for migrants, refugees and minorities since 2001. She speaks Romani fluently and, during her phone interview with the Independent, words from the Romani and other languages came out of her mouth with ease, pronounced perfectly. Plaut is clearly someone who deeply respects the details and uniqueness of different cultures.

In January 2014, Plaut began work as research and project manager on Strangers at Home, a Global Reporting Centre initiative featuring short films by a range of talented people in Europe – filmmakers, writers, cartoonists, musicians, scholars, as well as average citizens. The film project was aired at the United Nations High Commission for Human Rights in April 2016, and had its Canadian debut at Simon Fraser University Harbor Centre in September. It will screen at the main branch of the Vancouver Public Library on Nov. 19 during Media Democracy Days.

Most of the films are from the perspective of minorities – Jews, Roma, Muslims – but some are from the perspective of nativists who are acting out of fear of the increased presence of migrants and refugees. As the project website says, “Extremist voices are gaining political power, inspiring white Europeans to take to the streets to ‘claim back’ their place in Europe. As a result, millions of people in Europe are feeling like strangers at home.”

The nine videos, which can be viewed online, are rich and varied. Hate Poetry features Germans with “foreign sounding last names” reading hate mail, Queen of the Gypsies discusses how life has improved for Roma in Macedonia, Fascist Logic details the fear of immigrants felt by an Italian national, Teaching Racism looks at the discrimination against Roma in the schools of Czech Republic, Exceptionally Greek looks at the struggles of migrants in Greece, Hatschi Bratschi features a racist children’s book that continues to be a bestseller in Austria and Defending Russia presents the perspective of a paramilitary warrior in training to protect what he considers traditional Russian values.

Two videos deal specifically with Jews in Europe: Chasing Ghosts, by a non-Jewish cartoonist, examines the antisemitism present in Serbia despite the virtual absence of Jews, and Breaking the Silence looks at what the filmmaker sees as a conspiracy of silence about rampant antisemitism in Malmo, Sweden.

“We asked them, ‘What do you want people in North America to know about what’s happening in your country?” explained Plaut. “News coverage here can be sensationalistic, or overly simplistic. We wanted to hear from the people themselves, their stories. The way to do this is not to send another American journalist but rather to solicit the stories from the storytellers themselves.”

In Plaut’s view, the media jumps too quickly to simplistic narratives like “it’s 1938 again,” or lumps different countries with different problems together too quickly.

“Take Greece, for example,” she said. “The media is often quick to associate the rise of the right-wing with austerity, but we found Greek xenophobia to have more to do with deep cultural ideas about fears of impurity. When countries are portrayed in caricatures, that’s how they are engaged with. If diagnosis is incorrect, then the solution will be incorrect.”

Of the pieces that present the perspectives of nationalists themselves, Plaut said she was torn over whether to pay nationalists to present their views, but decided that, ultimately, it is important to hear their stories and understand where they are coming from as human beings as well.

“We can’t just write people off and say they are crazy,” she said. “People need to hear and understand that story, too. We can’t just shut off stories we don’t like.”

While the Strangers at Home project currently consists of nine pieces 60 to 90 seconds long, Plaut would like to see it expanded into 10-to-15-minute films comprising a feature-length documentary to go on the festival circuit, as well as being used online as an educational tool. Fundraising efforts are underway. For more information and to watch the videos, visit strangers.globalreportingcentre.org.

Matthew Gindin is a freelance journalist, writer and lecturer. He writes regularly for the Forward and All That Is Interesting, and has been published in Religion Dispatches, Situate Magazine, Tikkun and elsewhere. He can be found on Medium and Twitter.

The future of democracy

Israel’s President Reuven Rivlin spoke strong words at the opening of the Knesset’s winter session this week. The very survival of democracy, he suggested, is on the line.

“Against a background of political upheavals occurring in the West, the free world, it is no secret that democracy – or Western liberal democracy – is in a state of confusion,” said Rivlin. “Many citizens across the world feel that the existing democratic system is struggling to function and, moreover, is struggling to offer an answer to their needs in light of the current threat of terrorism, the current wave of migration and refugees, or the ongoing economic and employment crises.”

Rivlin was speaking broadly, apparently referencing the various movements springing up in recent years at the fringes of what was once the political mainstream. These include new nativist and often xenophobic movements in Europe. The vote by Britain to leave the European Union is a symptom of a strain of political ideology that rejects open borders – both for trade and for people. While the Brexit vote was supported by people across the political spectrum, its campaign was led by the United Kingdom Independence Party, a movement pushing its way into the mainstream from the far right.

While Europe struggles with the challenges of and reactions to economic meltdowns and waves of refugees and migrants, the presidential election in the United States has been rocked by events that also threaten foundational understandings of democracy.

Donald Trump, the Republican candidate for president, has suggested he may not abide by the results of the election, an outcome he is alleging to be “rigged.” There is no evidence, according to almost all commentators, of any rigging of the electoral system. Indeed, say most, the patchwork nature of the American electoral system makes comprehensive manipulation of a federal election essentially impossible. However, Trump’s assertions seem based less on the idea that the electoral infrastructure is rigged than on his perception that the media and the political establishment are nearly uniformly against him. As paranoid as this may seem, it is not altogether false. The political establishment, even in his own Republican party, is lukewarm at best toward their outsider nominee. And the media is merely reporting the attitudes of some of the public, many of whom are aghast and appalled at the successive emanations from Trump’s mouth.

However, if the establishment and commentators in the media are lined up against him, this should arguably be viewed as a statement about him, not them – which brings us back to the issue of Trump’s threatened refusal to admit defeat. Absolutely crucial to democracy is the legitimacy – and perception of legitimacy – of the electoral process. In the most contested election in modern history, in 2000, Al Gore accepted defeat even though he received more votes in the state of Florida than the declared victor George W. Bush and, therefore, should have been the winner. In the interest of national unity and the preservation of confidence in the system, Gore acceded to the determination of a Florida court.

Now, Trump suggests he may not accept the results even if he is conclusively defeated. Of course, anything is possible with this candidate, so it may be bluster. But the bigger picture in this scenario is the impact Trump’s words have on his followers. Some are already promising “revolution” if Trump is defeated.

Then, of course, there is the other possibility: Trump wins.

Where American democracy – and the country’s role as a model of responsible government – would go from there is an ominous mystery.

New Jewish journeys

The Jewish Heritage Travel tour to Lithuania, Latvia and Estonia inclues a visit to the historic Trakai Castle, in Trakai, ancient capital of the Grand Duchy of Lithuania. (photo from jhtravel.org)

In August 2015, the Museum of Jewish Heritage: A Living Memorial to the Holocaust will launch a new program devoted to exploring Jewish cultural destinations around the world. From the Baltic states to northern Spain, Cuba and Poland, Jewish Heritage Travel journeys will be unique learning experiences led by experts and accompanied by scholars who will shed light on Jewish life throughout the ages. In addition to private tours and lectures by some of today’s top scholars, many of the trips include opportunities to meet with Jewish community leaders abroad.

“We’re so pleased to be able to team up with Dr. Aryeh Maidenbaum, a world-class expert on educational travel,” said David G. Marwell, director of the Museum of Jewish Heritage.

Maidenbaum earned his doctorate at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem and is a graduate of the Jung Institute of Zurich. He brings with him more than 25 years of experience organizing and leading educational travel programs, including trips focusing on Jewish culture and history and psychology. He will be supported by a dedicated staff and able to draw from the museum’s resources.

The program will launch on Aug. 30 with Jewish Jewels of the Baltic: Lithuania, Latvia and Estonia. Highlights of the trip include the city of Vilnius, the countryside of Lithuania, Latvia and Estonia, the ancient capital Trakai, and the city of Riga, followed by Tallin. Prof. Sid Leiman, an expert on Lithuanian Jewry, will accompany the trip, which will run through Sept. 10.

From Oct. 28-Nov. 8, travelers can explore Mysticism, Music and Poetry: The Jews of Northern Spain with accompanying scholar Prof. Ray Scheindlin, an expert on the Jews of Spain. Travelers will visit Barcelona, Girona, Tarazona, Madrid, El Escorial and Toledo, where they will have the opportunity to tour the city’s surviving synagogues.

Travelers will discover A Marriage of Different Cultures when they arrive in Havana, Cuba, on Feb. 9, 2016. Once there, they will be treated to presentations by local scholars and experts, and an overnight excursion to Cienfuegos and Santa Clara. Along with the chance to meet local community leaders, there will be the opportunity to explore Havana and the outlying provinces and experience the flavor of Jewish life in Cuba.

The inaugural travel season will conclude with a look at Yesterday, Today and Tomorrow: The Jews of Poland, which will take place from May 2-12, 2016. Accompanied by Marwell, travelers will begin in Warsaw, where they will tour the new Museum of the History of the Polish Jews and other sites of interest. The next stop will be the old town of Wroclaw (Breslau), followed by a trip through Poland’s countryside and villages including Lodz. Visitors will continue to Krakow, then to Auschwitz-Birkenau State Museum and to the recently expanded Auschwitz Jewish Centre, for a private tour with the director.

All trips include deluxe accommodations, land transportation, some meals, and all lectures, presentations, guided tours and site entrance fees. For more information and to register, contact Jewish Heritage Travel at 1-825-256-0197 or [email protected], or visit jhtravel.org.