Tag: internet
Internet access and poverty
On Nov. 24., writer Penny Goldsmith spoke at King David High School about PovNet, a B.C.-based anti-poverty network.
When Storming the Digital Divide: The PovNet Story was published in August by Lazara Press, the Jewish Independent received a copy. A history told in words and through illustrations about the B.C.-based online anti-poverty community network, the JI waited until school started, as it seemed the perfect topic for King David High School teacher Aron Rosenberg’s social justice class. And it was.
Once students were into the rhythm of classes and the High Holidays had passed, Rosenberg met with Penny Goldsmith – PovNet founder and a longtime community organizer and advocate – to determine how to address the subject. Goldsmith wrote Storming the Digital Divide, while B.C. artist, writer and activist Kara Sievewright – who has been PovNet’s web coordinator and illustrator since 2005 – created the images, and there are additional drawings by artist, researcher and educator Nicole Marie Burton of Ad Astra Comix, which publishes comics with social justice themes.
Before Goldsmith even did her presentation to Rosenberg’s class on the morning of Nov. 24 – appropriately enough, a day that fell during KDHS’s Random Acts of Chesed Week – the students had homework. In pairs, they had to choose a bubble from the 12-page timeline laid out in the book, which, as the book notes, highlights “selected issues that are an important part of the history of work done by the many advocates and marginalized community members who use PovNet in British Columbia. It also scans the history of technology and organizing as it affects the anti-poverty movement in British Columbia.”
The timeline goes from 1971 – “The first email is sent” – to 2015, which contains several key developments, such as the province’s first seniors’ advocate (Isobel Mackenzie) being appointed and the release of a 40-page report in which “nine social services agencies from across B.C. have asked the ombudsperson of B.C. to launch a systematic investigation into service reductions at the Ministry of Social Development and Social Innovation (the welfare ministry) that shut out many eligible people from accessing social assistance.”
For Goldsmith’s presentation, students were asked to consider their chosen bubble with respect to a few questions: “What does the information in the bubble mean for poor people? For anti-poverty advocates who work with them? For you?” Divided into groups, a table spokesperson shared some of the thoughts that arose from the brief group discussion of the questions. Student Leora Schertzer, in her role as master of ceremonies, made sure that every student who wanted to contribute aloud was invited to do so.
Alternating between group discussion and Goldsmith’s talk, which included visuals of some of the book’s illustrated pages, the students considered questions that Goldsmith and Rosenberg had prepared in advance, such as “What do you think the digital divide might mean?” “What do you think the difference is between charity and anti-poverty work?” and “How do you envision a future online world?”
Once the students had a chance to think about the issues, Goldsmith offered her thoughts, using portions of the book, beginning with an explanation of its title.
“From trying to get a job, finding adequate housing and accessing government services … to networking with fellow advocates and fighting for social change, the internet is now at the very least an essential service,” said Goldsmith. Regarding the accessing of government services, she gave the example of qualifying for welfare, which requires the completion of a 90-screen online application.
She offered a few definitions. “Collins English Dictionary defines the digital divide as ‘the gap between those people who have internet access and those who do not.’ Simple,” she said. “Dictionary.com expands the definition to include ‘the gap between those who are computer literate and those who are not.’ An important addition. Other dictionaries expand the definition to include marginalized communities in developing countries.
“According to a report from the Public Interest Advocacy Centre published in July 2016,” she said, “one-half of low-income Canadians are trading off other household goods or services in order to pay their communications bill – almost one in five (17%) indicated they went without other essential goods such as food, medicine or clothing in order to pay a communications bill.”
A lack of money is not the only barrier to internet access.
“An online space can, by its very structure, leave out marginalized communities,” Goldsmith explained. “If English is not your first language, online communication is not always as easy as being in the same room together with your peers. If accessing a computer is an issue, particularly in rural communities, if technology is daunting – people get left out of the conversation.”
It is these barriers that PovNet also works to diminish.
“PovNet is an online community of social justice advocates, activists, community workers and marginalized people who work in the anti-poverty world in British Columbia and across Canada,” said Goldsmith. “It hosts a public website that provides up-to-date information about welfare, housing and homelessness, unemployment, disability and human rights issues.
“PovNet’s community of users is vast,” she continued. “A disability rights organizer in Nelson goes to the PovNet website to get some information for a community workshop she is doing that night about changes to disability bus passes. A tenant in the Lower Mainland of Vancouver goes online to find an advocate to help him deal with a landlord trying to evict him. Several workers at a women’s centre in a small northern British Columbia town sign up for an online course at PovNetU about dealing with debt because they have so many clients coming into the women’s centre who are being harassed by a local collection agency.
“But what’s important,” she said, “is that everyone who wants to, has to have access to PovNet. That means money for computers, and government commitment to universal bandwidth and internet access. It also means that all of PovNet’s diverse communities have to feel that the network belongs to them.”
Storming the Digital Divide contains many illustrated stories from the online anti-poverty community, which bring the facts and figures closer to home, as well as the impact of PovNet over the 20 years since it began in 1997. While Goldsmith is no longer the organization’s executive coordinator – a post she filled for 18 years, until 2015 – she remains passionate about its work. And some of it rubbed off. Here are some of the comments students wrote after her talk.
• “Penny’s presentation exposed me to how reliant our society and greater world is on the internet…. Those who are unable to access the internet or technology are at an automatic disadvantage for workplace opportunities and almost all information.” (Justine Balin)
• “Listening to Penny’s presentation last week gave me an insight into the challenges that people without access to the internet face. Hearing about how some people have to choose between paying for internet access or having dinner made me realize how much I take having internet for granted. I also realized how big of a luxury it is to have my own computer and the privacy that comes with owning my own device. Before hearing Penny speak, I never realized how large of an issue internet access was…. Hearing about PovNet and how they advocate for internet access for those who need it really opened my eyes to a social justice issue that I would have otherwise been oblivious to.” (Talia Buchman)
• “In ‘A PovNet Timeline,’ I chose to focus on the [2008] bubble that states that over 40% of people who died in B.C. of HIV-AIDS died because they never received the necessary treatment because they were poor. Reading this bubble disturbed me quite a bit. I was mostly disturbed because we, as a country, try so hard to be the best society we can possibly be (i.e. equal rights), however still tend to fail at the situation with people living in poverty. We advertise that Canada has free health care, but do we really?” (Michelle Nifco)
• “The cost to live in British Columbia has been rising steadily and the welfare rate has also been rising but not as fast as the cost of living. I am fortunate enough to not be relying on welfare and hope that I will never need to rely on it, but many Canadians rely on welfare cheques every month to keep a roof over their head and food in their stomachs.” (Elle Poirier)
• “What I found immensely important about my experience with Povnet’s work was what they called ‘A PovNet Timeline: A Selective History of Poverty, Anti-Poverty Organizing & Technology in B.C.’ The timeline was extremely motivational and taught me that if citizens have enough passion and drive, they can influence the powers that be, even when it may seem that said powers are completely inflexible or severely rigid. This premise was explored throughout a variety of different events within the timeline.” (Anthony Schokalsky)
Storming the Digital Divide ($12.95) is available from lazarapress.ca.
טרודו וקסטרו
מנהיגה לשעבר של קובה, פידל קסטרו, שנפטר ב-25 בנובמבר. (צילום: Antônio Milena/ABr via Wikimedia Commons)
ג’סטין טרודו מאבד גובה: תמיכתו בפידל קסטרו גרמה לראש ממשלת קנדה לראשונה לחטוף מכל עבר
ראש ממשלת קנדה מטעם המפלגה הליברלית, ג’סטין טרודו, חטף לראשונה ביקורת קשה מאוד מבית ומחוץ, לאור תמיכתו הנלהבת במנהיגה לשעבר של קובה, פידל קסטרו, שנפטר ב-25 בנובמבר. רבים ממנהיגי העולם המערבי בהם ארה”ב וכמובן מנהיגי האופוזיציה (מהמפלגה הקונסרבטיבית) לממשלת טרודו בקנדה, ביקרו אותו קשות לאור הדבריו שאמר לזכרו של קסטרו. המועמד לנשיאות בארה”ב מטעם המפלגה הרפובליקנית, מרקו רוביו (שהפסיד לדונלד טראמפ), הגדיל לעשות כשאמר: “האם הצהרה זו אמיתית או פרודיה? כי אם זה אמיתי זה מביש”. ואילו פרשן יחסי החוץ של הוול סטריט ג’ורנל, ברט סטיבנס, העיר: “הודעה מחפירה של ג’סטין טרודו. לא ג’סטין, פידל לא ‘שירת’ את העם הקובני. הוא הפך את העם למשרתיו במשך 60 שנה”.
המנהיג הקובני היה ידידו של אביו פייר אליוט טרודו, שהיה המנהיג המערבי הראשון שביקר אותו באי ב-1976, מאז משבר הטילים עם ארה”ב והאמברגו האמריקני. קסטרו לא שכח וב-2000 הגיע להלוויית טרודו במונטריאול. טרודו הבן מיהר לצאת בהצהרה כתובה לאחר שנודע שקסטרו נפטר. בה אמר בין היתר: “פידל קסטרו היה מנהיג גדול מהחיים, ששירת במשך כמעט חצי מאה. היה מהפכן ונואם אגדי, שהביא לשיפור עצום במערכת החינוך וכן מתנגדיו הכירו בהתמסרותו ובאהבתו האדירה לעם הקובני, שרחש חיבה עמוקה ומתמשכת למנהיג”.
האמנם טרודו? מומחה לנושאי קובה וקסטרו, הסופר ובמאי הסרטים, ירון אביטוב, שחי בעבר בקובה, כתב בימים האחרונים רשימה על קסטרו שפורסמה בעיתון מעריב. בין היתר כתב אביטוב: “קסטרו היה אחד העריצים האכזריים ביותר בתולדות המאה ה-20 ונחשב לאכזר ומרושע. הוא רדף את מתנגדיו ורבים הושלכו לכלא ונמקו שם, בעיקר סופרים ועיתונאים. לאורך השנים מאות אלפים גלו מקובה, או ניסו לברוח ממנה למיאמי ברפסודות רעועות, וחלקם נטרפו על ידי כרישים. את הבשורה המהפכנית, שהייתה אמורה לשמש מודל וחיקוי במאבק נגד האימפריאליזם, השחיתות והסיאוב, המיר קסטרו ברודנות מושחתת ומסואבת, שרק מרקסיסטים עיוורים עוד דוגלים בה. במהלך כהונתו העשיר קסטרו את קופתו הפרטית על חשבון העם שהסתפק בנזיד עדשים, עד שזכה להיכלל ברשימת מאה עשירי העולם של המגזין פורבס. קסטרו הפך את קובה לאחת המדינות העניות המרודות בעולם. מדינה שרוב תושביה משתכרים סכומים שלא היו מספיקים לרכישת פלאפל ברחוב דיזינגוף. רוב תושבי קובה מתחננים בפני תיירים שירכשו עבורם תרופות שאין להשיגן, לא מעט מבנותיה מציעות את מרכולתן בשוק הבשר האכזרי, מדינה שסובלת מהפסקות חשמל ומים תכופות, מרבית אוכלוסייתה ניזונה מפנקסי קיצוב וכל אדם שפותח את הפה עלול להיות מושלך למאסר ממושך, ואף גרוע מכך”.
החשש מדונלד טראמפ: ארכיון האינטרנט האמריקני יצור עותקי גיבוי בקנדה
לאור החשש ממדיניותו הבעייתית והמסוכנת של הנשיא הנבחר של ארה”ב מטעם המפלגה הרפובליקנית, דונלד טראמפ, ארכיון האינטרנט האמריקני החליט ליצור עותקי גיבוי לעת חרום בקנדה. בהנהלת הארכיון הדיגיטלי חוששים כי טראמפ מסוגל להפעיל צנזורה קשה שתפגע בחופש הפעולה שלהם, ולכן הוחלט ליצור ‘אתר ראי’ שלא במפתיע ימוקם בשרתים הקנדיים שמעבר לגבול. עלות יצירת עותקי הגיבוי בקנדה תעלה מיליוני דולרים והארכיון מחפש עתה מקורות מימון ותרומות, להפעלת הפרוייקט המסובך.
הארכיון הדיגיטלי האמריקני (שהוא ארגון שלא למטרות רווח) פועל מזה כעשרים שנה, ומאחסן כל העת עמודי רשת. יצויין כי מדי שבוע הארכיון גדל בכשלוש מאות מיליון עמודי רשת חדשים, שכוללים ספרים, סרטונים, תוכנות, מוסיקה ועוד.
This week’s cartoon … Jan. 22/16
For more cartoons, visit thedailysnooze.com.
The elite aren’t who you think they are
At any given time, but especially in recent weeks when Israel’s conflict with Hamas has been front-page news, a perusal of the comments under any story involving Jews almost inevitably devolves into some variation on the theme of Jewish control. It is notable how frequently, even in 21st-century Canada, Jews are depicted as manipulating the media and puppet-mastering the powerful, like the United States.
The advent of the electronic age has brought the phenomenon to even greater levels of intensity. We are now all broadcasters. We are all publishers. We are all curators of the news.
A few years ago, the vast majority of North Americans gathered their information from the same couple of sources. While every city and town had its own newspaper, these mostly received international news from the same few press agencies. On television, Canadians were offered CBC or CTV. We now have access to hundreds of English-language TV stations and millions, if not billions, of other sources for whatever information we seek. News, which was once a staid medium, has morphed into infotainment, in which beheadings in Iraq mingle with Kardashian marriages.
Time was, one could count on the fact that most of the people at your dinner party would have heard what Barbara Frum had said the previous night or would catch the reference to a Wayne and Shuster skit. Now, if you don’t “get” the references, an electronic device will promptly be provided so that you can watch the original source of the reference itself.
There is certainly something democratizing about this panoramic access to information. Yet there may be something contra to healthy democracy in this situation, as well. The underpinnings of a successful civil society rest partly on a shared foundation of knowledge. As we have become more individualized in our choices of what we know or ignore, those shared foundations are crumbling. That a great number of young people get their news from sources like Jon
Stewart’s The Daily Show is slightly reassuring in the sense that at least they’re getting some knowledge of world affairs, similar to the transition in the 1960s when attitudes changed from viewing comic books as something akin to pornography to a resigned attitude that “at least the kids are reading.”
It is true that social media has helped young people – all people – take up causes and devote themselves to social change if they seek to do so. One of the greatest examples was this summer’s ubiquitous Ice Bucket Challenge, which has raised millions of dollars for ALS research and advocacy. Still, there is a diminishing of comprehensive, shared, reliable news and information upon which all people form their opinions.
In a democracy, everyone has the same voice at the ballot box. But a democratic society is not formed only on one day every four years. A thriving democratic society requires the engagement of an informed population every day. From that perspective, democracies risk losing an important element of viability and vibrancy when a huge proportion of the population is choosing the garden channel over Newsworld, TMZ over the New York Times.
For centuries, there has been the conspiracy theory that a tiny minority somehow controls knowledge and everything that goes with it. In a strange way, this myth may be approaching reality. But it is not Jews who are the elite increasingly controlling what transpires in the world – it is the diminishing number of people who are actually paying attention.
This is not, like the conspiracy theory, the effect of a minority seizing control from the masses. It is the opposite: it is masses of people abdicating their right and responsibility to be informed, active participants in democratic society. And, as more people look away from the uncomfortable realities of the world, a smaller and smaller elite – those who choose to remain informed – will have an outsized influence on public opinion and what governments do worldwide.