Tag: Liberals

דואר קהילתיות

קנדה פוסט מקפיאה את החלטתה להפסיק לחלק דואר דואר לבתים פרטיים. (צילום: Bernard Gagnon via commons.wikimedia.org)

תוצאות ראשונות של ניצחון הליברלים בבחירות לטובת האזרחים: קנדה פוסט מקפיאה את החלטתה להפסיק לחלק דואר דואר לבתים פרטיים

הניצחון המוחץ של המפלגה הליברלית בבחירות בתשעה עשר באוקטובר ותבוסת מפלגת השמרנים, מביאה כבר לשינוי משמעותי ראשון לרווחת התושבים. רשות הדואר הקנדית קנדה פוסט החליטה בימים האחרונים להקפיא את החלטתה השנויה במחלוקת, להפסיק ולחלק דואר לבתים פרטיים (בעיקר לאילו שנמצאים באזורים מרוחקים). מדיניות זו של קנדה פוסט נוגעת לכחצי מיליון קנדים, והיא נקבעה בשנה שעברה כביכול לאור הפסדים כספיים כבדים של רשות הדואר. השנה הרשות דיווחה דווקא על רווחים נאים במאזנה. כתוצאה מכך חלק גדול מבעלי הבתים הפרטיים נאלצים כבר בשנה האחרונה לאסוף את הדואר בעצמם, ממתקנים של תיבות דואר קהילתיות, שרבים מהם כבר הוקמו בכל רחבי המדינה. רבים מתנגדים למדיניות קנדה פוסט בהם כאמור המפלגה הלברלית שזכתה ברוב הקולות בבחירות, איגוד עובדי רשות הדואר כיוון שדוורים רבים יאבדו את מקום עבודתם, וכמובן אזרחים רבים.

בקנדה פוסט מציינים כי המדיניות לעבור לתיבות דואר קהילתיות תיבדק מחדש בעצה אחת עם הממשלה הליברלית החדשה, ברשות ג’סטין טרודו, שהושבעה השבוע. מכל מקום אילו שכבר אוספים את דברי הדואר שלהם מתיבות קהילתיות, ימשיכו לעשות זאת עד להודעה חדשה. ולעומתם אילו שתיבות הדואר הקהילתיות שלהן עדיין לא הוקמו, ימשיכו להינות מחלוקת דואר עד לביתם.

תושבת בירת קנדה אוטווה מצאה דרך מקורית להיאבק בקנדה פוסט שעמדה לבנות מתקן לתיבות דואר בסמוך לביתה. מרי-מאי דאוניג כועסת מאוד על רשות הדואר שהחליטה להקים מתקן של תיבות דואר קהילתיות, דווקא ליד הגינה המטופחת שלה, מול ביתה בו היא גרה לא פחות עשרים שנים. דאוניג ידעה כבר לפני כחצי שנה (בחודש אפריל) כי המתקן יבנה ליד ביתה, ומאז היא נערכת להיאבק כל הכוח ברוע הגזרה. כל בקשותיה מרשות הדואר שתעתיק את את המתקן למקום אחר עלו בתוהו. לפני מספר ימים אף הופיעו מספר עובדים של קנדה פוסט למקום ליד ביתה בכוונה להכשירו, להקמת המתקן. דאוניג הבינה שאין לה שום דרך להפסיק את הפרוייקט מלבד נקיטה בצעד פיזי יוצא דופן, ובתקופה האחרונה היא נשכבה במלוא קומתה כל יום על השטח שמיועד למתקן. היא פגשה במקום מפקח בנייה של רשות הדואר ואמרה לו מפורשות כי ההחלטה להקים את תיבות הדואר הקהילתיות, מנוגדת למדיניות הממשלה החדשה של המפלגה הליברלית. לדבריה הרשות שהיא קורפורשיין ממשלתי, אינה יכולה להתעלם מהחלטת הממשלה ומרצון הציבור הרחב שבחר בה. המפקח לא התכוון לעצור את בניית המתקן ודאוניג נערכה להמשיך ולשכב במקום כל יום. ולשמחתה שכנייה ואיגוד עובדי רשות הדואר תמכו במאבקה והבטיחו לעזור. אך כאמור קנדה פוסט החליטה בשלב זה להפסיק את המשך פרוייקט הקמת תיבות הדואר הקהילתיות, ודאוניג יכולה לחזור ולחייך והיא אינה צריכה עוד לשכב על האדמה הרטובה ליד ביתה.

מכרה יהלומים חדש בקנדה שבהקמתו הושקעו כמיליארד דולר

חברת ‘יהלומי מאונטיין פרובינס’ הקנדית (שמניותיה נסחרות בבורסת ניו יורק) תפעיל מכרה יהלומים חדש בשם ‘גאציו קיו’, שיכנס לפעולה במחצית השנייה של השנה הבאה. המכרה שמשתרע על פני שטח של למעלה מעשרת אלפים דונמים, נמצא בטריטוריות הצפון-מערביות, במרחק של כשלוש מאות ק”מ מעיר הבירה ילונייף. בבניית הפרוייקט מושקע סכום גבוה מאוד שנאמד ב-1.1 מיליארד דולר. בהקמת המכרה מועסקים כיום כשש מאות עובדים. ובעת יכנס לפעולה בשנה הבאה יועסקו בו כארבע מאות עובדים.

Liberals sweep into power

Justin Trudeau schmoozes after a speech to the Richmond Chamber of Commerce in July. (photo from Justin Trudeau’s Office)

As Justin Trudeau’s Liberal party swept to a majority victory Monday night, it was British Columbia that finally made a difference. Without the 17 seats the Liberals took here, Trudeau would have won, but with a minority mandate – albeit a big one.

The Liberals swamped Vancouver and its suburbs, winning some seats that few, if any, observers anticipated they were even competitive in, particularly in the eastern suburbs. The North Shore was a Liberal sweep. In Vancouver South, the Conservatives lost their only foothold in the city as incumbent Wai Young lost to Liberal Harjit Sajjan.

Liberals Joyce Murray (Vancouver Quadra) and Hedy Fry (Vancouver Centre), the only two Liberals elected from British Columbia in 2011, trounced their respective opponents. Murray more than doubled the votes of her nearest competitor, a Conservative, and Fry almost tripled the vote of the second-place New Democrat.

The new riding of Vancouver Granville, slicing through the centre of the city north to south, is a microcosm of what appears to have happened locally and nationally. Several organizations had formed to encourage Canadians who opposed Harper’s Conservatives to vote strategically for the candidate most likely in their riding to defeat the Conservative. In Granville, Leadnow, probably the most prominent of the anti-Harper organizations, urged voters in the riding to back New Democrat Mira Oreck. This drew a backlash from Liberals, who said their candidate was either tied or ahead of the New Democrat in the available public opinion polls and the Vancouver Sun noted the friendship between Oreck and the head of Leadnow. In the end, so-called “change voters” seem to have looked at the national polling trends – which, by the end of the campaign, showed the Liberals slightly ahead of the Conservatives and NDP support dissipating – and turned red. In the end, Liberal Jody Wilson-Raybould took nearly 44% of the vote, with Oreck and Tory candidate Erinn Broshko effectively tied at 26%, Oreck edging out the Tory by 38 votes for second place; Green candidate Michael Barkusky took about three percent. Oreck and Barkusky are members of the Jewish community.

There were no clearly evident trends in ridings across the country with concentrations of Jewish voters. In the Montreal riding of Mount Royal, held until the election by retiring Liberal Irwin Cotler, Anthony Housefather, the Liberal candidate and mayor of the suburb of Cote-Saint-Luc, beat Conservative Robert Libman by a comfortable margin. Both Housefather and Libman are Jewish.

In Thornhill, the Toronto-area riding with the country’s largest concentration of Jewish voters, Conservative incumbent Peter Kent trounced Liberal Nancy Coldham. In Eglinton-Lawrence, incumbent Conservative finance minister Joe Oliver, the most senior Jewish official in Ottawa, lost by a significant margin to Liberal Marco Mendicino. In York Centre, another Toronto riding with large numbers of Jewish voters, Tory Mark Adler was narrowly defeated by Liberal Michael Levitt. Adler is known nationally mostly for his foibles, such as calling out to advisers of Prime Minister Stephen Harper at the Western Wall in Jerusalem to be included in a photo opportunity and, several weeks ago, for seeming to exploit his family’s history in the Holocaust for political gain.

In 2011, post-election surveys indicated that Jewish voters supported the Conservative party by large margins. Though such indicators are not yet available for this week’s election, it appears that Jewish voters are far from being a monolithic bloc.

Will Israel policy change?

Days before the federal election, the Liberal party ran an ad in the Canadian Jewish News promising, “On Oct. 19, our government will change. What won’t change is Canada’s support for Israel.”

This message effectively echoes what Prime Minister-elect Justin Trudeau told the Jewish Independent in an exclusive interview in July. However, what candidates say and what elected officials do can sometimes differ. When the Liberal party was last in office, their approach to international affairs, particularly during votes at the United Nations, took a “go along to get along” approach that too often saw Canada siding with despotic regimes against Israel.

Jewish and Zionist voters may have thought that Conservative rhetoric on Israel was just that, rhetoric. But very shortly after Stephen Harper became prime minister, the Gaza war erupted and Canada became Israel’s most vocal ally on the international stage. Our country would remain such for nearly a decade.

Critics – inside the Jewish community and beyond – often saw cynical motivations in the Conservative government’s position vis-a-vis Israel. Either it was motivated by political expediency, Jewish votes and financial support or millenarian Christian theology. Harper repeatedly insisted that the government’s policy was motivated simply by the principle of standing by a democratic ally and the Jewish people, nothing more or less.

Whether the decade of Harper’s unapologetic support for Israel is the reason, or whether Canadians have come to the judicious conclusion that Israel is not the malevolent entity that some extremists proclaim, Harper’s view is now mainstream in Canada. So much so that the Liberal party felt obligated to promise that there would be no change in approach. Even the New Democrats, who have a history of harboring some of Canada’s most strident Israel-haters, officially takes a pro-Israel position.

The NDP’s collapse in Monday’s election may change that. It was during the NDP’s weakest period, in the 1990s, that anti-Israel extremists were able to seize the Middle East policy reins of the party. Leader Tom Mulcair steadfastly dragged his party back to a more reasonable position on the topic, but he will certainly be gone soon from the leadership and everything he did and stood for seems likely to be analyzed for a place to lay blame, whether deserved or not.

Of course, outside of a small cluster of voters, Israel and Palestine were not core issues. They were certainly not issues that turned the election. In the end, it was a desire for change and, perhaps, a backfiring of Conservative attack ads and rhetoric that led to the outcome.

The Conservatives blanketed Canada with ads promising us that Trudeau was “just not ready,” which lowered expectations so dramatically that when he was able to hold his own in successive party leaders debates, he could hardly help but exceed the low threshold the Conservatives had created for him among Canadian voters. This, combined with a comparatively positive Liberal campaign and the fact that, in the final days, it was clear that the Liberals, not the NDP, were to be the choice for change, seems to have created the perfect storm that led to the majority government.

We now have the opportunity to see if the Liberal party will indeed stand by its word. Liberals have repeatedly insisted that they are every bit as committed to Israel’s security as the Conservative government. Now they have a chance to prove it. If they do, it will be evidence that support for a Jewish, democratic state, our greatest ally in the region, is not a Conservative value, but a Canadian one.

Resignation, apology

Ala Buzreba, the 21-year-old Liberal candidate in Calgary Nose Hill, has withdrawn from the federal election campaign after vicious tweets attacking readers were revealed.

Buzreba apologized on Aug. 18 for the tweets, saying they were “made a long time ago, as a teenager, but that is no excuse.”

“They do not reflect my views, who I am as a person or my deep respect for all communities in our country,” she stated on her Twitter page.

The University of Calgary student announced her withdrawal later that evening, on the same day she tweeted how proud she was to be part of Liberal Leader Justin Trudeau’s team promoting real change.

“After the unfolding of today’s events, I have decided to step down as the Liberal candidate for Calgary Nose Hill,” she stated.

Speaking during a campaign appearance in Sault Ste. Marie, Ont., Trudeau said, “When someone makes a mistake, it’s important that they own up to it and they apologize.

“Ala has unreservedly apologized for her comments and I think it’s important to point out that she was a teenager and that we all make mistakes.”

The tweets that prompted Buzreba’s apology and withdrawal employ vicious language to attack a variety of targets. One is a supporter of Israel, who in a 2011 tweet is told his mother should have used a coat hanger for an abortion. Another insults gay women, when Buzreba said her new haircut made her look like “a flipping lesbian.” And, in a third, she wrote, “Go blow your brains out you waste of sperm.”

Responding to critics, Buzreba tweeted that “young people, myself included, have learned a lot of lessons about social media. Those 2009-2012 tweets reflect a much younger person.”

Ironically, earlier this month Buzreba retweeted a tweet from Jerome James, Liberal candidate for Calgary Shepard, who spoke at an anti-bullying rally. It is, he stated, “An important cause to support.”

– For more national Jewish news, visit cjnews.com.

Canadian political support of Israel notable

As the conflict rages in Israel and Gaza, so it does, in a different way, worldwide. As is always the case when Israel is involved in a conflict, the rage level escalates swiftly among commentators, social media, street activists, politicians and diplomats. While both sides are engaging in heated and contentious “debate” – we should take nothing away from Zionists’ ability to engage in slapfests on social media – something darker is emerging.

Protests in France and Germany have been especially grisly. In Paris, one synagogue was firebombed while, at another, Jews were forced to barricade themselves inside the shul as a mob attacked with bats and chairs. Jewish-run businesses were ransacked in a Paris suburb. In Germany, overt neo-Nazis are marching daily, some chanting, “Gas the Jews.” “Anti-Israel” rallies worldwide are rife with anti-Jewish imagery and messaging. Individual Jews have been assaulted around the world. One man in Australia, badly beaten, told media that the antisemitic onslaught he experienced after going public was worse than the assault itself.

There are certainly examples of anti-Jewish prejudice amid the public discourse in Canada, though we have seen nothing near to what is happening elsewhere. In fact, the brightest spot in the whole sad global discourse around the conflict comes from right here in Canada. For the better part of a decade, the Conservative government of Prime Minister Stephen Harper has been an unequivocal voice of reason and support for Israel’s right – obligation, he said – to defend its citizens from terrorism. Our foreign policy has been steadfast in defending our closest ally in the region, and the only democracy there, amid a cacophony of vitriol and hatred.

Significantly, what was a few years ago considered a surprising and unusually unambiguous position has become the dominant Canadian political consensus. Liberal leader Justin Trudeau has issued a statement echoing the Conservatives’ strong support for Israel.

More remarkable has been Thomas Mulcair’s extraordinary success at turning his New Democratic Party from what was once a nest of Canada’s most vocal anti-Israel zealots into a moderate party in line with the other two mainstream parties. He has done this in the face of a small but venomous clutch of extreme Israel-haters. A writer on the website Rabble recently referred to “Mulcair’s abhorrence of Palestinian rights.” (We have been known to employ some extravagant semantics in this space, but for a really eccentric level of rhetoric almost unknown since the fall of the Berlin Wall, head over to Rabble for a nostalgic walk down memory lane.)

Mulcair’s accomplishment, of course, is derided by Israel’s enemies as proof that the craven Zionists have finally got their talons into the last of the major parties’ platforms. In reality, it is an acknowledgement that Canada’s body politic has recognized, alas, that morality and pragmatism demand that we stand with our allies and against those who seek to slaughter them. There is nothing novel in this – what was novel was the years when we went off the rails trying to play an “honest broker” role between a democratic, peace-seeking, pluralist Israel and the genocidal terrorists determined to destroy the country and kill its citizens.

There is a place for extreme views in a democracy – in extreme, fringe parties. Which may explain why Green party leader Elizabeth May is right now taking up an anti-Israel cudgel just as the rest of the civilized political spectrum is affirming the only position mainstream, moderate parties can justify.

There are tactical reasons, too. Israel-bashers insist that Harper’s Israel policy (and now that of the Liberals and NDP) is a sop to win Jewish votes, which suggests they are as bad at math as they are telling terrorists from allies. The “Jewish vote” in Canada is miniscule and shrinking, while the number of new Canadians coming from places where hatred of Israel is something akin to a birthright is growing.

While the three main parties are doing the right thing, the Greens seem ready to welcome those who have been left out in the cold by a consensus that our country should stand with democracies when they are under assault from terrorists. It may be a political strategy for a tiny party seeking a foothold, but it doesn’t seem like a moral one.