The Western Jewish Bulletin about uscontact ussearch
Shalom Dancers Dome of the Rock Street in Israel Graffiti Jewish Community Center Kids Wailing Wall
Serving British Columbia Since 1930
homethis week's storiesarchivescommunity calendarsubscribe
 


home > this week's story

 

special online features
faq
about judaism
business & community directory
vancouver tourism tips
links

Sign up for our e-mail newsletter. Enter your e-mail address here:



Search the Jewish Independent:


 

 

archives

March 14, 2003

Media under the microscope

Local newspaper defends its editorial position on Letters page content.
JAMIE BONHAM SPECIAL TO THE JEWISH BULLETIN

The Letters page of the Jewish Western Bulletin is one of the "holiest pages" in the paper, according to one of the Bulletin's owners, because it is the one part of the paper that is completely owned by the public. That sentiment came out of a discussion about letters to the editor that formed part of a Philosophers' Café this past Saturday. It was the last Jewish community Philosophers' Café of the season at the Jewish Community Centre of Greater Vancouver and it covered the topic The Voice of Communal Concerns: Challenges and Responsibilities of the Jewish Press.

The evening was an opportunity for the community to tell the owners and editor of the Bulletin what they believed the role of the Jewish press should be in Vancouver and whether the Bulletin has met those expectations.

The topics discussed ranged from the day-to-day realities of running a newspaper to the larger questions of what issues should be covered and what opinions should be expressed. Present for the discussion were publisher and co-owner Cynthia Ramsay, reporter and co-owner Kyle Berger and editor Baila Lazarus. Rabbi Yosef Wosk facilitated the evening, encouraging the attendees to engage the Bulletin staff in an honest dialogue about what the Bulletin means to them.

The focus of much of the discussion was the section of the paper dedicated to letters from the community. Berger noted that the letters page was one of the "holiest pages" in the paper. He encouraged readers to write to the editor more often and share their opinions in the communal forum of the Letters page, even if those opinions attack the paper.

"We aren't afraid to publish something that is negative, that criticizes us," said Berger.

A common concern that was voiced throughout the evening was the amount of space in the Letters page given to people espousing views that contained anti-Israel biases. Several attendees suggested that the Bulletin was too lenient in allowing these sentiments to be aired in a Jewish newspaper. Lazarus defended the publishing of such letters by arguing that in order for real debate on the issues to progress, Jews in particular need to know what is being said about Israel. The Jewish community needs to see the arguments being raised against Israel, as well as who is raising them, in order to effectively refute them, she said.

"We do have a policy where we really try to put in all the letters that come to us," said Lazarus. "Once you start deciding about one letter over the other, you begin to stick a big editorial foot on your Letters page.... We as Jews don't look for those articles that criticize Israel. If you don't know that these are the arguments being used against Israel, you will never be able to influence those who [harbor] views against Israel."

"It keeps us honest, I think, because sometimes we might go into an event and we may or may not bring our biases into it," added Ramsay. "I'd rather know what people are saying about us, and what their arguments are and who they are."

In light of the older readership of the Bulletin, the speakers were asked what they were doing to engage the youth of the community in the paper. According to Berger, the difficulty of appealing to the youth of the community is reflective of the general problem of enticing youth to become involved with the Jewish community.

"It's difficult with young people," he said. "The first step is to get them to care about the community before we can get them to care about reading the Bulletin. That's the order that things fall into."

"Part of the challenge of that is that we want to encourage young people without alienating the people who are actually subscribing, which is the older generation. It's a tough balancing act," explained Ramsay.

Other Jewish newspapers with much larger markets and thus much larger budgets are able to provide coverage of non-Jewish events such as music and the arts, in order to attract an audience of youth and unaffiliated Jews, Lazarus said. According to Ramsay, the Bulletin is hindered in this respect due to the lack of funds.

"We are a privately owned business, which I think a lot of people don't understand. The size of the paper is completely dependent on the amount of advertising we get," said Ramsay. She said that they would like to act on ideas such as crossword puzzles or entertainment listings of non-Jewish events,
but that more financial support was needed.

It was noted that most Jewish newspapers in other communities were partly or wholly dependent on Federation funds, as opposed to the independently owned Bulletin. The downside of being tied to Federation funds, according to Lazarus, was that your editorial choices would often be made for you due to the sensitivities of the organization. If the Bulletin were not a privately owned paper, readers wouldn't get to see the same range of topics that are currently covered in the paper, she said.

Several people complimented the Bulletin staff on the recent editorial encouraging Jews to take their support of Israel to the streets. A few of the attendees said that they felt the paper was not strident enough in its defence of Israel and that the editorial was a welcome change. However, some speakers stated that they appreciated the fact that the Bulletin was a community paper and were happy to have less coverage of Israel in favor of more support of the local community.

In her opening statements, Lazarus described the difficulty of meeting the needs of the entire community in such a small paper while still keeping the paper interesting. Not everything can fit in the paper and sometimes there are hard decisions to make about what makes it into the paper and what doesn't, she said.

"My biggest challenge, as the editor, is to make this paper the best quality newspaper I can make it," said Lazarus. "And how do I do it in such a way that we maintain our identity as a Jewish paper and as a community paper? In any ethnic paper, the responsibility is trying to reflect the community that it serves. For us it is reflecting the diversity, the challenges, the goals and the hopes of every person in the Jewish community."

Jamie Bonham is a freelance writer living in Vancouver.

^TOP