The Western Jewish Bulletin about uscontact ussearch
Shalom Dancers Dome of the Rock Street in Israel Graffiti Jewish Community Center Kids Wailing Wall
Serving British Columbia Since 1930
homethis week's storiesarchivescommunity calendarsubscribe
 


home > this week's story

 

special online features
faq
about judaism
business & community directory
vancouver tourism tips
links

Sign up for our e-mail newsletter. Enter your e-mail address here:



Search the Jewish Independent:


 

 

archives

March 14, 2003

Hope prevails on campus

Jewish students seeking balance on Mideast issue.
PAT JOHNSON SPECIAL TO THE JEWISH BULLETIN

In the second of a two-part series about the atmosphere on Canadian campuses, the Bulletin takes a close look at developments at Vancouver's two main universities.

Last November, when Arash Ben Shaul and some friends formed the Israel Advocacy Club at the University of British Columbia (UBC), they felt surrounded by anti-Israeli sentiment and, to some extent, threatened by anti-Semitism.

The atmosphere on Canadian campuses has been heated in the past two years, with the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and an impending war with Iraq as flashpoints. Rioting at Concordia University and less violent conflicts at other institutions of higher learning have made university administrators wary and the Jewish community deeply concerned about the tenor of discussion on campuses.

Instead of hiding from the glare of attention, though, British Columbia's Jewish students have made a deliberate effort to put a human face on the Zionist cause. Last week, Ben Shaul and other UBC students, along with Hillel House, organized Israel Week on that campus and were pleasantly surprised by the reaction with which they were met.

"We have come to realize that the majority of students on this campus – I would go so far as to say 95 per cent – are unaligned [on the issue of Israel and Palestine]," said Ben Shaul. The third-year commerce student used to feel at risk wearing his Magen David on campus, but no longer has such worries. Most of his fellow students, he said, are willing to listen to both sides of the discussion and come to a fair conclusion. Jewish students, he said, just need to get the message out.

"I don't believe this is an uphill task," he said. "I don't believe this is a battle the other side has won. We just haven't played well yet."

Ben Shaul and his UBC allies played well last week, organizing speakers each day and putting on a display of persuasive pro-Israel posters in the Student Union Building. The posters included historical facts about the wars Israel has faced and debunked some common arguments made against the Jewish state. United Nations Resolution 242, which was adopted in 1967 following Israel's successful victory against neighboring Arab states, is often used as an argument against Israel's presence in the so-called occupied territories. The Hillel posters reminded students that the resolution called for Israel's withdrawal from the Palestinian areas, but only in exchange for peaceful coexistence and the recognition of Israel's right to exist free from violent aggression.

Jeff Nider, a third-year biology student who helped run the display booth, said that by late Friday, the reaction from fellow students had been entirely civil.

"Some people shake their heads and walk away, but nobody has said anything negative to me," said Nider, who is a member of Alpha Epsilon Pi, a Jewish fraternity whose members volunteered to help out during Israel Week.

Eyal Lichtmann, director of Vancouver Hillel, was thrilled with the Israel Week events and the effort that students had put into it.

"I'm very, very proud of the students," he said. The depth of knowledge, commitment to Israel and the pride they displayed in going public with their views could be a model for campus debates elsewhere, said Lichtmann.

Ariel Zellman, the student organizer who took responsibility for Israel Week, said the display and the guest speakers on campus had educated many students. And even if it hadn't changed their minds, he said, it let students know that the UBC debate over the Middle East is not as one-sided as it might seem at other universities.

One of those other universities is Simon Fraser (SFU), which has campuses in Burnaby and in downtown Vancouver. The passion with which SFU students have engaged in the Mideast debate has reinforced its reputation as a centre of student activism. The student government passed a resolution last month condemning Israel and calling it an "apartheid" state. Though discussion has been intemperate on campus, there have been no hints of violence and top administration officials say the atmosphere remains civil.

Gregg Macdonald, a spokes-person for SFU president Michael Stevenson, was careful to point out that the university administration is essentially divorced from the student government and the resolution passed by the Simon Fraser Student Society in no way reflects the administration's views. Macdonald, the director of the president's office, added that the student society may not even represent a majority voice of students.

"It is an elected body, although I think it is fair to say the participation rate in the elections is marginal," he said.

Although the debate has been passionate on campus, Macdonald refutes the idea that Simon Fraser University is facing the same sort of conflict seen at
Concordia. SFU is dedicated to dialogue and free academic expression, he said, citing the university's Morris J. Wosk Centre for Dialogue as a tangible example of dedication to civil discussion. Open discussion of the Middle East issue is welcome at SFU, he added.

"I think it's extremely healthy what is going on," said Macdonald. "It's extremely important that contrary opinions be heard."

The reaction of Jewish students on campus is also healthy, said Macdonald.
"These ideas are being exchanged," he said. "This is as it should be. It is not a bad thing."

Where the administration would take exception, he said, is if the discussion devolved into slurs or violence, something he insists has not occurred.

"[We would have] no tolerance for that type of thing," he told the Bulletin. "We have an obligation to provide a safe environment for everybody."

Meanwhile, Jewish students and their allies at SFU are waiting to see if the response from their fellow students will be as pleasant as the reaction UBC students experienced last week. This week is Israel Week at SFU, with the same posters that were used last week at UBC now on display at the Burnaby campus.
Elliot Campbell, SFU's representative to Vancouver Hillel, spoke to the Bulletin as they were setting up the display on Monday. Initial response from students was agreeable, he said, but he held some trepidation, despite having been at UBC last week.

"It's kind of scary what's happening up here," Campbell said of his own campus. "It's a little worrisome, but we are going ahead with our plans."

He said he expected more critical reaction at SFU than the UBC display elicited.
"The climates at both schools are completely different," he said.

Brent Zacks, an SFU student who is head of the Israel Advocacy Committee on campus, admitted he was scared on Monday morning, but said early response was pleasantly surprising.

One of the features of Israel Week at SFU is a petition calling on the student society to revisit the resolution it passed condemning Israel, in favor of a more balanced approach.

Zacks, who is on the student committee that can recommend (but not vote on) resolutions that go before the student society's board, is urging the student government to adopt a resolution calling on both Israelis and Palestinians to immediately end all violence, negotiate mutually agreed borders and create a democratic Palestinian state side-by-side with a peaceful Israel.

"It's a lot different from the current resolution, which is inflammatory," said Zacks, who is running in student elections later this month on a slate opposed to resolutions on foreign policy issues.

The Bulletin tried to contact the SFU student society for a comment. As of press time they had not responded to repeated requests for interviews.

Despite disagreements, both sides express the hope that discussion will remain civil on campus. If so, British Columbia's students may be able to offer pointers to campuses where violence and a lack of civility have overtaken rational discussion of Middle East affairs.

Pat Johnson is a journalist and commentator.

^TOP