The Western Jewish Bulletin about uscontact ussearch
Shalom Dancers Dome of the Rock Street in Israel Graffiti Jewish Community Center Kids Wailing Wall
Serving British Columbia Since 1930
homethis week's storiesarchivescommunity calendarsubscribe
 


home > this week's story

 

special online features
faq
about judaism
business & community directory
vancouver tourism tips
links

Sign up for our e-mail newsletter. Enter your e-mail address here:



Search the Jewish Independent:


 

 

archives

December 13, 2002

The next prime minister?

New Labor chair open to negotiating about Jerusalem.
EDGAR ASHER SPECIAL TO THE JEWISH BULLETIN

Haifa mayor, and now the newly elected chairman of the Israel Labor party, Amram Mitzna, took time out from his electioneering Nov. 27 to meet with representatives of the foreign press in Israel. As confident and relaxed as Mitzna seems, with his views expressed in very good English, he seems to be talking in a vacuum, hardly reflecting the undoubted move to the right of many of his Labor colleagues and certainly most of the Israeli electorate.

The new Labor leader and former Israel Defence Forces general, who has twice been elected as mayor of Haifa, has had no parliamentary experience whatsoever, but he certainly feels that this should be no impediment to his becoming prime minister. He cites his experience as mayor of one of Israel's biggest cities and the fact that he was OC Central Command during his many years in the army as giving him the credentials to become Labor's candidate for prime minister. The Labor party members who elected him last month also thought this, giving him an impressive majority over former party leader and defence minister Binyamin Ben Eliezer.

Everything is new for Mitzna, and he spoke of "new responsibility," "new hope," "new horizons" and "a new future."

"We have no choice – despite the terror we have to speak to our enemies," Mitzna told the journalists. "We have to tell the Palestinians that they don't have any other choice either.... I will call the Palestinians to come back to the negotiating table without preconditions. But we will continue to fight terrorism like there is no negotiation and we will negotiate like there is no terrorism. If there is no response from the Palestinians, then we will have to disengage ourselves completely from them."

Mitzna said that after he is elected he will, over the period of one year, remove all the Jewish settlements in the Gaza Strip.

When asked if he would negotiate with Yasser Arafat, Mitzna replied, "Arafat is leading the terrorism against Israel. Arafat has positioned himself as an enemy to the people of Israel. But, as I said before, you make peace with enemies and, therefore, once I am elected I will call the Palestinians to come back to the negotiating table and we will negotiate with a Palestinian leadership that will be able to deliver the goods, to talk openly, sincerely and bravely to reach an agreement."

Mitzna's reply – that seems to indicate that he would, under certain circumstances, talk with Arafat – is a position that is totally opposite to both Ariel Sharon and Binyamin Netanyahu. Neither of these men would negotiate with Arafat under any circumstances – at least that is what they have said.

Without spelling it out in detail, Mitzna indicated that if he were in charge, there would be an adjustment in the Israel-Palestinian border on the West Bank. He said that there is still a tremendous amount to be done in the Galilee and the Negev and many of the settlers living in the West Bank could help to populate these areas. When asked how he would get the West Bank settlers to leave, he said, "I'm sure that most of them will obey legal decisions taken by the government of Israel. The Israelis know that we have to make very deep and painful concessions for peace and also people need leadership in this direction and I will do it."

Mitzna was unequivocal when it came to the fight against terror.

"We have to fight terror with all the force we have," he said. "What the government is doing now, I would do the same. The difference in my policy is that while fighting terrorism we will negotiate."

Most of the topics that Mitzna spoke about were expressed in generalities. When questioned about the future of Jerusalem, he said, "We will have to negotiate about Jerusalem. We will have to make arrangements in Jerusalem, which means disengagement, even in Jerusalem."

Only time will tell, but a politician who is prepared to even discuss sovereignty over Jerusalem will surely find that this is not a vote winner.

Edgar Asher is with Isranet News and Media Service.

^TOP