The Western Jewish Bulletin about uscontact ussearch
Shalom Dancers Dome of the Rock Street in Israel Graffiti Jewish Community Center Kids Wailing Wall
Serving British Columbia Since 1930
homethis week's storiesarchivescommunity calendarsubscribe
 


home > this week's story

 

special online features
faq
about judaism
business & community directory
vancouver tourism tips
links

Sign up for our e-mail newsletter. Enter your e-mail address here:

Search the Jewish Independent:


 

 

archives

April 15, 2005

Rabbi rallies for rights

Clergy from all denominations back same-sex unions.
PAT JOHNSON

A Vancouver rabbi was responsible for bringing several hundred people – including representatives of most Canadian faith groups – together to support Canada's proposed legislation recognizing same-sex marriage.

Rabbi David Mivasair, spiritual leader of Vancouver's Ahavat Olam Congregation, was among the key organizers of the Sunday afternoon event on the grounds of the Vancouver Art Gallery.

Several hundred participants, including at least a dozen clergy members, rallied in support of equal marriage as part of a series of similar rallies in cities across Canada organized by a group called the Religious Coalition for Equal Marriage Rights. A mass rally was held on Parliament Hill in Ottawa the day before, opposing same-sex marriage.

Mivasair, who has been a vocal proponent of equality for gays and lesbians, said it was time for progressive people of faith to let their views be known. "The religious angle on same-sex marriage in the public discourse until now has been entirely dominated by the religious right – and I know they don't represent us all," Mivasair told the Bulletin. "There are many religious organizations and communities and entire nationwide churches like you see here today that are in favor of same-sex marriage and they weren't being heard."

While some Orthodox and other Jewish religious leaders oppose gay marriage rights, Mivasair said the legislation does not likely contradict halachah [Jewish law], because the bill deals only with civil marriage. "I don't know what halachah has to say about Canadian civil law," he said. "Rabbis may have different opinions about that. I don't know if halachah has anything at all to say about Canadian civil law. Does halachah say two non-Jews who love each other shouldn't be recognized by the civil law? I don't think so. Halachah talks about Jews." Even when the discussion is about marriage between Jewish gays or Jewish lesbians, Mivasair said, halachah is interpreted differently. "Halachah evolves. Halachah changes. Halachah has never been static," he said.

Mivasair was joined by many other clergy members, including the former head of the country's largest Protestant denomination. Bob Smith, a former moderator of the United Church of Canada, referred to his church's long association with the issue of blessing same-sex couples. "I am so grateful that we are able to gather in this way after the long struggle in which we and so many of you have been engaged," Smith told the crowd.

The religious leaders endorsed a statement, released publicly this week, affirming Canada's diversity and supporting same-sex marriage. "The Religious Coalition for Equal Marriage Rights includes representatives from liberal and traditional faith communities in Canada," according to the statement. "The coalition attests to the diversity of religious opinion on the question of equal marriage rights for same-sex couples and growing support in religious communities for equality for those couples."

Rev. Philip Cable of First United Church, in Vancouver's Downtown Eastside, was another of the organizers. He said the rally and the coalition include representation from the United Church of Canada, the Canadian Unitarian Council, the Muslim Canadian Congress, the Canadian Friends Service Committee (Quakers), the World Sikh Organization, the Coalition of Liberal Rabbis for Same-Sex Marriage, some Anglican congregations and individual members of the Baha'i, Buddhist, Catholic, First Nations, Hindu and Mennonite communities.

"We believe that Bill C-38, the Civil Marriage Act, upholds the religious freedom of those opposed to same-sex marriage and will not discriminate against them any more than the legal recognition of divorce did in the last century," the statement said. "Offering anything less than marriage, such as civil unions, would perpetuate a second-class status for same-sex couples, which is unacceptable.... Members of many of our communities are from racial and religious minority groups and themselves experience discrimination. We understand that human rights, as guaranteed in the Charter of Rights and Freedoms, must extend to everyone, including gay men and lesbians. Same-sex marriage is a human right."

Politicians were also at the rally, including two members of Parliament. Bill Siksay, the New Democratic party MP for Burnaby-Douglas, said his presence at the rally was motivated by his faith. "I'm a believer," said Siksay. "I'm a Christian and also a parliamentarian, so I wanted to be here with my faith community, St. John's United Church, to witness this important legislation and the important need to pass it." Siksay's faith is strong – especially on the issue of the eventual success of the government's same-sex marriage bill. "It's going to pass, I say that with great confidence," said the New Democrat.

His Liberal colleague, Hedy Fry, MP for Vancouver-Centre, said the rally reflected her perception that many religions believe equal marriage to be an issue of social justice. "For me, it's a simple issue of charter rights, it's an issue of discrimination, it's an issue of social justice, it's an issue of human rights. How can you fight against any of those things?" Fry asked.

The rally came on the heels of a week of tumult in Ottawa, with new revelations about the sponsorship scandal. No Conservative MPs were at Sunday's rally, but the possibility of a non-confidence vote bringing down the Liberal minority was top of mind among the crowd. If an election were forced and the Conservatives were elected, Fry said, it would represent a lurch backward on this issue.

"I think it would not only be a setback in the fight for same-sex marriage and civil marriage," she said, "it would be a setback against what I consider to be a lot of human rights issues and charter issues that we have fought for so long and have believed in for so long in this country. It would be set back very, very much, to pre-charter times."

The government aims to have the legislation passed by the time the House rises, likely in June. If an election intervenes, the bill will die.

Pat Johnson is a B.C. journalist and commentator.

^TOP