Avi Benlolo, president of the Canadian Friends of the Simon Wiesenthal Centre for Holocaust Studies, was recently quoted in the National Post saying that Jewish university-bound applicants should consider options other than Toronto\u2019s York University. The reason? A faculty association executive proposal to divest from weapons manufacturers. The proposal didn\u2019t mention Israel by name.<\/p>\n
According to Benlolo, this is a \u201ccampaign of censorship against Israel and the Jewish people.\u201d The organization also issued a statement declaring that, in the wake of the proposal, it was \u201cconcerned for the safety and security of [York\u2019s] Jewish students and faculty.\u201d<\/p>\n
I recently combed through the 2015 report of the Simon Wiesenthal Centre on antisemitism on American campuses, headlined: \u201cA Clear and Present Danger.\u201d Over the 26-page document, I discovered a few antisemitic incidents over the eight preceding years. (I selected an eight-year period to represent two generations of students at a four-year university or college.)<\/p>\n
As the report detailed, at Harvard in 2013, to raise awareness of Palestinian home demolitions, activists slipped mock eviction notices into dorm rooms. There was no evidence to suggest whether Jewish students were targeted. And, in 2014-2015 at University of California-L.A., Rachel Beyda, a Jewish student, was barred admission to a judicial position by the student council following accusations that her Jewish heritage made her biased. After an uproar, the administration pressured the council to reverse itself. A similar dynamic played out at Stanford in 2014, when Molly Horwitz was asked, \u201cGiven your strong Jewish identity, how would you vote on divestment?\u201d<\/p>\n
The report also noted a \u201cdecade\u201d of \u201cincreasing hostility\u201d at the University of California-Berkeley in 2015, \u201cincluding \u201cvandalizing Jewish property, spitting at Jewish students, threatening violence, and physically assaulting Jewish supporters of Israel.\u201d<\/p>\n
Incidents like these should be called out strongly. But every other event chronicled since 2007 in the Simon Wiesenthal Centre report described political activity directed against Israel or its policies \u2013 not instances of antisemitism.<\/p>\n
The latest mudslinging debate in the antisemitism wars is more nuanced. It concerns a talk by gender studies scholar Jasbir Puar at Vassar College, an event that authors of a Wall Street Journal<\/em> op-ed described as antisemitic and a blood libel.<\/p>\n In the talk (of which I received a transcript), Puar made two particularly jarring claims. About the bodies of 17 Palestinian youth that Israel kept for two months at the end of 2015, Puar said, \u201cSome speculate that the bodies were mined for organs for scientific research.\u201d (These youth, it is important to note, had been attacking Israelis. Puar described these Palestinian youth as having been involved in \u201cstabbing\u201d and as part of a \u201cpeoples\u2019 rumble\u201d but called their deaths \u201cfield assassinations.\u201d)<\/p>\n Puar also suggested that Israel engages in \u201cweaponized epigenetics, where the outcome is not so much about winning or losing nor a solution, but about needing body parts, not even whole bodies, for research and experimentation.\u201d<\/p>\n Puar did not respond to my requests for comment or clarification regarding her accusations.<\/p>\n While academic freedom is a principle meant to protect scholarly speech from legal censure, there is an equally important norm requiring a scholar to provide evidence when making empirical claims. On this, Puar failed.<\/p>\n But is Puar\u2019s scholarly breach antisemitic?<\/p>\n Joshua Schreier, an associate professor of history at Vassar and part of the steering committee of the Jewish studies program that was one of the co-sponsors of the talk, doesn\u2019t think so. He attended the event. \u201cIt\u2019s really important,\u201d he told me, \u201cto protect free speech and protect academic speech,\u201d adding that \u201cwe have a responsibility, as academics, when we talk about speculation, to note \u2026 whether it\u2019s substantiated, whether we\u2019re trying to give new life to those rumors, or not, but none of that makes it antisemitic.\u201d<\/p>\n Unfortunately, the unsubstantiated charge of using \u201cbody parts for experimentation\u201d cuts close to the bone of blood libel myths. It is also uttered in the context of a cultural moment on campuses when most criticism of Israel is inappropriately being cast as antisemitic. This surely means that there will be fallout from the talk that will serve to distract debaters from the pressing issues around the ills of occupation. It also means that amid the hyperbolic rhetoric about antisemitism on campuses, actual antisemitism is becoming more difficult to spot when it does occur.<\/p>\n Meanwhile, hundreds of faculty members from across the United States have issued a statement to Vassar\u2019s president asking her to \u201cwrite a letter to the Wall Street Journal<\/em> \u2026 condemning in no uncertain terms the unjustifiable attack on Vassar and on Professor Puar.\u201d<\/p>\n For its part, the Anti-Defamation League had nothing more damning to say about Puar\u2019s appearance at Vassar than that she has sometimes accused Israel of pinkwashing.<\/p>\n Ian S. Lustick, a professor of political science at University of Pennsylvania, told me by email that he signed the statement \u201cto show solidarity against the campaign to restrict the space of politically correct discussion on anything pertaining to Israel and Palestinians.\u201d About the claim of organ harvesting, Lustick said that \u201cthe speculations about horrific<\/p>\n Israeli behavior with respect to organ harvesting from Palestinian bodies are as unlikely to be true as they are likely to be circulated as long as Israel refuses to quickly return bodies of dead Palestinians to their families.\u201d<\/p>\n Debate over campus discourse on Israel (and even on things like armaments, weirdly perceived by some to represent Israel) will continue. Vassar\u2019s president, for her part, invited parents and alumni to an online forum to discuss \u201ccurrent issues and tensions within our community related to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.\u201d<\/p>\n As for whether actions on campuses over the last decade constitute antisemitism, the ledger is mixed. Verbal or physical harassment directed at Jews for reasons related to their ethnic or religious identity is antisemitism. Same with leveling dual loyalty charges against Jewish students.<\/p>\n But consideration of divestment from weapons companies is not antisemitism. Criticism of Israeli policy is not antisemitism. Criticism of the occupation is not antisemitism. Criticism of violence \u2013 whether it is state-sponsored violence or violence carried out by individuals or groups \u2013 is not antisemitism.<\/p>\n Presenting unsubstantiated claims against agents of a state in a public lecture is irresponsible. And, if the symbolism chosen for these non-evidenced charges quacks like an infamous antisemitic myth, it will, not surprisingly, be heard by many as redolent of that scourge. But that does not necessarily make it, in and of itself, antisemitism.<\/p>\n Mira Sucharov<\/strong> is an associate professor of political science at Carleton University. She is a columnist for <\/em>Canadian Jewish News and contributes to <\/em>Haaretz and the <\/em>Jewish Daily Forward, among other publications. A version of this article was originally published on haartez.com.<\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Avi Benlolo, president of the Canadian Friends of the Simon Wiesenthal Centre for Holocaust Studies, was recently quoted in the National Post saying that Jewish university-bound applicants should consider options other than Toronto\u2019s York University. The reason? A faculty association executive proposal to divest from weapons manufacturers. The proposal didn\u2019t mention Israel by name. According […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[10],"tags":[801,3555,5595,5596,3976,2873,4330,1372],"class_list":["post-18017","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-op-ed","tag-antisemitism","tag-bds","tag-benlolo","tag-blood-libel","tag-boycott","tag-free-speech","tag-israel","tag-simon-wiesenthal-centre"],"blocksy_meta":{"styles_descriptor":{"styles":{"desktop":"","tablet":"","mobile":""},"google_fonts":[],"version":8}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.jewishindependent.ca\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/18017","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.jewishindependent.ca\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.jewishindependent.ca\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.jewishindependent.ca\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.jewishindependent.ca\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=18017"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.jewishindependent.ca\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/18017\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.jewishindependent.ca\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=18017"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.jewishindependent.ca\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=18017"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.jewishindependent.ca\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=18017"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}