The Jewish Independent about uscontact ussearch
Shalom Dancers Vancouver Dome of the Rock Street in Israel Graffiti Jewish Community Center Kids Vancouver at night Wailiing Wall
Serving British Columbia Since 1930
homethis week's storiesarchivescommunity calendarsubscribe
 


home

 

special online features
faq
about judaism
business & community directory
vancouver tourism tips
links

Search the Jewish Independent:


 

February 25, 2011

Shaming is not the answer

MIRA SUCHAROV

Many political players and observers have been discussing Israel’s recent social tensions using the language of shame. When 39 Israeli rabbis issued a letter urging their fellow citizens not to rent apartments to Arabs, for example, Knesset speaker Reuven Rivlin told a Haaretz reporter that the letter “shames the Jewish people.”

When David Rotem, an MK from the ultranationalist Yisrael Beiteinu party, proposed a bill that would cease to recognize conversions performed by Conservative and Reform rabbis, then-Labor (now Independence) MK Einat Wilif said she was “ashamed of those who in the era after the establishment of the state of Israel accept the authority of rabbis that belong to a pre-Zionist era.”

When past president Moshe Katzav was convicted of rape, sexual assault and harassment, Haaretz senior legal commentator Ze’ev Segal wrote that Katzav has “brought a mark of shame to our democracy.” And when the Knesset decided in early January to strike a parliamentary committee to investigate left-wing nongovernmental organizations, Meretz MK Nitzan Horowitz called it “a shame on the Knesset.”

But, as a Diaspora Jew, I am not ashamed of the rabbis’ letter, reminiscent, as it is, of some of European Jewry’s darkest memories. I am not ashamed of the conversion bill, which slaps the face of the liberal forms of Judaism in which I invest considerable time and emotional energy. I am not ashamed of Katzav’s acts of sexual brutality. And I am not ashamed of the sudden turn to investigate left-wing groups in Israel, as if those who seek a more just and humane society constitute a fifth column.

I am distressed. I am alarmed. I am saddened. But I refuse to feel ashamed by any of these chinks in the armor of Israel’s democracy, because as soon as we own another’s actions – as if we, ourselves, committed them – we forfeit our ability to be the critic we need to be as self-declared friends of Israel. Shame is certainly an evocative way to express political anguish, but shame also can do something very unhelpful: it can lead the ashamed to turn inward, burying the problem rather than fixing it.

With shame can come ostrich-policies, allowing Israel to careen down a dangerous course. What Israel needs more than anything is to turn outward and – to borrow a phrase from Justice Louis D. Brandeis – have sunlight disinfect the anti-democratic tendencies gripping the country in a chokehold.

With sunlight and a microscope and a dry leaf, perhaps we can hope to ignite a smoke signal to send to our Israeli kith and kin to let them know that we care. Nurturing a sense of shame isn’t going to help. Opening Israeli policies up to the light just might.

There’s a short line to be drawn between the propensity to feel collective shame – whether within the chambers of the Knesset, along the Tel Aviv-Jerusalem corridor or across the communities of the Diaspora – and not wishing to “air one’s dirty laundry,” as the tired phrase goes.

Israel’s democracy is hurting. Its institutions are vibrant, but its pluralistic, tolerant character is eroding. Israel is in danger of becoming an illiberal democracy, that hybrid political veneer that public intellectual Fareed Zakaria warned us about a decade ago, as many democracies the world over – particularly young ones – were scoring well on ballot boxes but low on liberties.

Many individuals and groups engaged in mainstream Israel advocacy would no doubt agree that the trends I listed above are problematic, and maybe even tragic, but some Israel advocates are taught to think that any trenchant criticism of Israel is like a missile, threatening Israel’s well-being. But the logic is mixed up. Only robust discussion of where Israel’s democracy is headed can have a hope in heck of saving it.

Many Diaspora voices are doing just that, realizing that to support Israel doesn’t mean enabling illiberal tendencies. Groups like the New Israel Fund, Peace Now and Ameinu are the kinds of friends that will help Israel regain its democratic composure. Canadian Jews, sadly, have been slower than our American counterparts to join this urgent conversation.

Let me hereby ask my fellow Canadians who will join me? The time is now to turn outward, toward the light of honest critique. And that – rather than turn away in silent shame – is what friends do for each other.

Mira Sucharov is an associate professor of political science at Carleton University. She blogs at huffingtonpost.com/mira-sucharov.

^TOP