The Western Jewish Bulletin about uscontact ussearch
Shalom Dancers Dome of the Rock Street in Israel Graffiti Jewish Community Center Kids Wailing Wall
Serving British Columbia Since 1930
homethis week's storiesarchivescommunity calendarsubscribe
 


home > this week's story

 

special online features
faq
about judaism
business & community directory
vancouver tourism tips
links

Sign up for our e-mail newsletter. Enter your e-mail address here:



Search the Jewish Independent:


 

 

archives

April 25, 2003

SFU incumbents get dumped

University elections knock out the anti-Israel student representatives.
PAT JOHNSON SPECIAL TO THE JEWISH BULLETIN

In a landslide rout, the student government of Simon Fraser University (SFU) has been tossed out and a new group elected, after a campaign that featured a bitter campus debate over the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

The election followed a confrontational period in which the Simon Fraser Student Society adopted a resolution condemning Israel and siding with the Palestinian cause. The level of debate over the issue made many Jewish students on campus uncomfortable and drew the close attention of both the university administration and the Jewish community. Brent Zacks, president of SFU's Israel Advocacy Committee, was elected to the new government as the at-large arts representative. There are 13 elected positions on the society's board and only one member of the previous administration was returned. Two positions remain unfilled as they were uncontested. Those seats will be filled by appointees of the newly elected government.

A resolution adopted by the outgoing government stated that the Simon Fraser Student Society "calls for the immediate end to the illegal U.S.-backed Israeli occupation of the West Bank and Gaza Strip, the right of return for all Palestinians to their homes and an end to Israeli apartheid."

Zacks ran on a slate that sought to reconsider the anti-Israel resolution. Zacks and two others from his Students First slate were elected and, in conjunction with members of other slates who were successful, Zacks expects the resolution to be rescinded, but not until further education and discussion take place on campus.

"There needs to be education before people can make their decisions," said Zacks, adding that the very low voter turnout for these sorts of elections has always allowed a small number of vocal people to set the agenda. In addition to conventional debates that feature spokespeople from both sides of the issue, the new government may undertake a formal process of interviewing students on their opinions to ascertain a truer picture of campus attitudes and reduce the influence of self-selecting activists.

Zacks stressed that any sort of polling process would have to be undertaken in a fair-minded way by open-minded students. He acknowledged that he, whose
opinions on the subject are well-known and entrenched, would not be part of the interviewing process. Moreover, if a consultation process demonstrates strong support for the anti-Israel position, the resolution could stay on the books.
"If we can involve students and there is strong support for the current resolution, there's not much we can do," he said.

The election included some unpleasant tactics, including an apparently concerted effort to remove Zacks' campaign posters.

"I think I put up about 150 of them and by the end there were about 10," said the fourth-year political science student. "I don't know who ripped them down, but it's obvious someone didn't like what I said."

Zacks' opponent for the arts rep position is associated with the Palestinian Solidarity Group on campus. Ironically, Zacks credits his 16-vote margin of victory to a raft of spoiled ballots that included some with his name scrawled out and comments to the effect that Zacks is a racist.

"It was certainly pivotal in my election," he said. "I wouldn't have won if they hadn't [spoiled their ballots]."

The elections took place March 25 to 27 and results were announced March 29. But in case people try to read the election results as a referendum on the Israeli-Palestinian issue, Zacks cautioned that there were other critical factors at play. Zacks was victorious with a mere 277 votes and many of those came from personal contacts he has in residences and in athletics programs. Moreover, as much as Israel has dominated the campus debate, Zacks estimates that as many as 150 of the votes his slate received came as a result of their promise to replace powdered soap with a liquid alternative in campus washrooms. Nonetheless, Jewish students on campus are feeling less isolated after a successful Israel Week recently, in which on-campus displays and information material met with surprisingly positive and constructive – or at least not negative – reactions from most students.

Fanning the flames of the debate have been more than a year of controversial articles in the student newspaper, the Peak. One, which ran two weeks before the student elections, condemned candidates like Zacks, who seek balance in the discussion. In a piece titled "Consult this," Peak features editor Ian Rocksborough-Smith criticized candidates who sought to cool the discussion.
"With the exception of a few, most candidates want to recognize both sides in the conflict, as if there is a moral parity to be struck between an aggressive imperial power with a nuclear arsenal and a desperate yet resilient indigenous population with jammed Kalashnikovs and rocks – as if there isn't clearly an oppressor and an oppressed," wrote the editor.

The SFU debate reflects the tenor of attitudes on campuses across Canada over Middle East affairs, including opposition to the war in Iraq. At Montreal's Concordia University, a violent demonstration against an aborted appearance by former Israeli prime minister Binyamin Netanyahu led to a protracted conflict that saw the student government on that campus cut funding and recognition to the Jewish student organization, Hillel. That action is being challenged in Quebec courts by the students, with the support of Canadian Jewish Congress. More recently, the university administration has asked the Quebec government to decertify the student union at Concordia. Though the Montreal university – which has a reputation for radical politics – is home to the most public conflict over the Middle East, other campuses, such as the University of Toronto, have seen their share of strife, including a series of petitions calling on universities to divest from Israel.

Meanwhile, B'nai Brith Canada has set up a Web site – www.jewishstudentscanada.ca – that offers a portal for Israel activism and camaraderie for Jewish students across the country.

^TOP